Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Eliminating widows host pollution?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-15 16:03:45
On 03/15/2016 01:51 PM, Kuhl, Brian wrote:
> Many thanks for your quick reply.
> Most the replacements are straight forward, but this one has me concerned.
> Is NT/gcc-cygwin a meaningful configuration separate from <target-os>cygwin or <os>CYGWIN ?
There is no such toolset as gcc-cygwin. The
only way to get this is if someone puts
using gcc : cygwin ;
in a Jamfile.
The correct way to identify this is
perhaps just <target-os>cygwin.
> I have no way of verifying this, and I would like to push my changes upstream eventually.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk