Subject: Re: [Boost-build] building boost static libraries with position independent code
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-08-25 15:10:54
That would force PIC code on static libraries, it seems. It might not be
the best idea, since position independent code needs a few indirections,
and therefore will be a tad slower. It's not a big deal for desktop
systems, but might become a problem on less powerful hardware.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016, 15:36 Peter Steinbach <steinbach_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
> this dirty fix would make PIC work in static boost libs for gcc:
> branched from boostorg/build:develop
> tested with boost 1.59.0 and gcc/5.3.1. With your permission, I'd submit
> a PR.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk