Subject: Re: [Boost-build] rule execution order
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-16 19:27:22
On 16.10.2016 18:36, Rene Rivera wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:watanabesj_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> On 10/16/2016 02:55 PM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Is there any reason you can't just
> call sphynx-build directly from the Jamfile
> without going through make?
> Because that doc building should only run for the "boostrelease" target.
Can you elaborate ? I don't understand how the target that invokes the
doc build relates to how the doc build is implemented.
For simplicity's sake, right now I'd like a simple invocation of
`.../b2` in the 'doc/' directory to build all of Boost.Python's
A related question I was wondering about: is the documentation building
being CI-tested somehow & somewhere ? Can the generated docs be
inspected for manual / visual testing ?
I can see the auto-generated Boost.Python docs in
http://boostorg.github.io/python/, but that process uses SCons, not
Boost.Build, so I have no way to verify that what I'm working on right
now actually works (beside running it locally on my laptop, that is).
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk