Subject: Re: [Boost-build] [future] Implementation language(s)..
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-18 10:31:52
On 18.10.2016 10:28, Klemens Morgenstern wrote:
> I'd provide both C++ and Python extensions, otherwise I do agree. I'll
> see if I can come up wiht a way to build a plugin-system that may
> understand more than one language, but with one interface; if that
> works providing more than one language for extensions shouldn't be a
> problem at all.
I'd caution against that. A build system consisting of plugins written
in many different languages is just begging for trouble for maintenance.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk