Subject: Re: [Boost-build] [future] Implementation language(s)..
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-25 15:21:58
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 25-Oct-16 10:07 PM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>> Do you have any ideas how Python syntax might look?
>> Not right now; it requires some prototyping. I could try to play around
>> over the next couple of weeks to see what I can come up with.
>> (Didn't we have this very same discussion already many years ago ? :-) )
> Yes, I'm fairly sure we did ;-)
If there is a discussion on dropping Jam, then we need to see how
target definition is going to look like. In my mind it seems it is not
going to look good but I'm no python expert. If, however, it is possible
to have a embedded DSL in python itself for target definition, then
it would probably be the best scenario.
> Vladimir Prus
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk