Subject: Re: [Boost-build] adding tests conditional on compiler's C++11 support
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-11-13 15:24:08
On 11/13/16 11:37 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> Of course it's not all that clear why boost.filesystem should depend
>> upon wstring when it could conjure up basic_string<wchar_t> but I
>> can't go everywhere.
> They're the same thing!
right - that's my point. I don't see why the WSTRING macro exists at
all. I'm not really pursuing it. I assume that for some reason
basic_string<wchar_t> doesn't work in that system.
> Best, John.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk