Re: [Boost-build] adding tests conditional on compiler's C++11 support

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] adding tests conditional on compiler's C++11 support
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-11-13 15:24:08

On 11/13/16 11:37 AM, John Maddock wrote:

>> Of course it's not all that clear why boost.filesystem should depend
>> upon wstring when it could conjure up basic_string<wchar_t> but I
>> can't go everywhere.
>
> They're the same thing!

right - that's my point.  I don't see why the WSTRING macro exists at 
all.  I'm not really pursuing it.  I assume that for some reason 
basic_string<wchar_t> doesn't work in that system.

>
> Best, John.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>