Re: [Boost-build] Is there any difference , or is this redundant ?

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Is there any difference , or is this redundant ?
From: Kuhl, Brian (brian.kuhl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-10 03:03:09

Hi Steven,
Is there anything special about contributing to the ASIO library, the pull requests don't seem to get much attention?

Thanks,

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost-build [mailto:boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Steven Watanabe via Boost-build
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 5:05 PM
> To: Kuhl, Brian via Boost-build
> Cc: Steven Watanabe
> Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Is there any difference , or is this redundant ?
> 
> AMDG
> 
> On 01/09/2018 02:38 PM, Kuhl, Brian via Boost-build wrote:
> > Hi I'm looking to update my pull request to ASIO and I'm looking at various NT
> logic that's are causing problems for cross-compiles.
> > > In various ...
> > libs/asio/example/... /Jamfile.v2
> >
> > else if [ os.name ] = NT
> > {
> >   lib ws2_32 ;
> >   lib mswsock ;
> > }
> > <snip>
> >     <os>NT:<define>_WIN32_WINNT=0x0501
> > <snip>
> >
> > Could we not just ?
> >
> >     <target-os>windows:<library>ws2_32
> >     <target-os>windows:<library>mswsock
> >
> 
> Yes, <target-os> is the correct way.  <os> has been obsolete for years.
> 
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build