Subject: Re: [Boost-build] New doc format.
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-16 19:13:47
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build <
> On 01/16/2018 10:01 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build <
> > boost-build_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>> - There's no syntax highlighting for Jam.
> > Was that syntax highlighting manual before? We could certainly work on
> > adding support for syntax coloring for that component. But that would be
> > separate work as it's an off-the-shelf syntax coloring module it uses
> > (which you can configure to use different ones).
> boostbook has code for highlighting jam (I wrote it).
> I'm assuming that there's some way to plug in our
> own highlighter.
I'll have to check on that.
> It's independent of the rewrite,
> but it's something that I want to be implemented before
> this goes live.
Sure. I'll go research what options we have on that. In an ideal world we
could augment the default one it uses and push that upsream. As that way a
bunch of other web contexts would get jam coloring.
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk