Boost logo

Boost-Build :

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] New doc format.
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-20 01:12:41


On 01/18/2018 09:42 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build <
>> boost-build_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> It's independent of the rewrite,
>>> but it's something that I want to be implemented before
>>> this goes live.
>> Sure. I'll go research what options we have on that. In an ideal world we
>> could augment the default one it uses and push that upsream. As that way a
>> bunch of other web contexts would get jam coloring.
> OK, looked at the coloring.. Did the easiest attempt first. I implemented a
> jam language coloring for highlight.js. And used that as the coloring for
> the doc. And I did a partial tagging of the docs with the "[source,jam]"
> attribute. Please take a look at the updated docs.

It doesn't seem like it quite works:

- The highlighting of keywords and rulenames seems
  be interfering with each other somehow.
- The comment/keyword/rule colors seem to be the same.

Note: I can send you my emacs mode, which has the highlighting
mostly correct, if that would help. I'm also willing to
port one of my existing highlighters myself if you can point
me to the system I need to implement.

Also, I dislike javascript based highlighting on principle.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at