Subject: Re: [Boost-build] explicitly-specified values of non-free feature <threading> conflict
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-22 16:17:59
On 01/22/2018 06:53 AM, Phillip Seaver via Boost-build wrote:
> On 1/17/18 12:46 PM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build wrote:
>> Proposed solution:
>> - Boost.Build should ignore non-free usage requirements
>> and issue a warning.
> Sorry to come in late to the discussion -- I fell behind on keeping up
> with this group.Â I don't remember if I try to use a non-free feature in
> usage requirements, but it would be nice if you could.
It would be nice, but it's really complicated
and I don't have a consistent model of what
ought to happen.
>Â However, if it
> doesn't support it, I think it should be an error.
It should be, but for now I'm compromising with
a warning to avoid breaking everything.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk