Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Boost-build Digest, Vol 165, Issue 1
Date: 2019-05-03 16:29:54
Thanks for both (including spotting the gratuitous colon ;-( )
Obviously I should be using the cxxstd method (avoiding the confusing C++ Std
syntax difference between MS and *nix) and I have done that successfully both
Finally I have compiled, linked and run my example using 5 compilers, 4 C++
standard versions, debug and release, 32 and 64-bit in one run
But if you want to sell B2, I feel very strongly you have do very much better on
providing EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES.
You can never, ever have too many examples, especially with a bizarre syntax
like bjam, growded-like-topsy B2, and how-not-to-do-it syntaxes of the build
Thanks again for all your work on this powerful tool and all the help to me.
PS Reminds me what a disaster the use of track 8 as a parity bit on paper tape
was - with that extra bit we could/would/should have had more symbols in the
character set to make syntaxes simpler and better.
From: Boost-build <boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of
Sent: 3 May 2019 13:00
Subject: Boost-build Digest, Vol 165, Issue 1
Send Boost-build mailing list submissions to
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
You can reach the person managing the list at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of Boost-build digest..."
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk