Re: [Boost-cmake] Test feedback

From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-17 13:07:30

Justins's suggestion:

> It seems like it would be easier to have a testing 
> configuration file that specifies the necessary configuration options.  For 
> example, we could have "BoostTestingSlave.cmake"

was a good one, you can hide details and reduce the number of steps and 
avoid editing the cache.

Please see

   http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/CMakeForRegressionTesters

for updates to the procedure.

-t