Boost logo

Boost Interest :

From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-17 13:07:30

Justins's suggestion:

> It seems like it would be easier to have a testing
> configuration file that specifies the necessary configuration options. For
> example, we could have "BoostTestingSlave.cmake"

was a good one, you can hide details and reduce the number of steps and
avoid editing the cache.

Please see

for updates to the procedure.


Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at