Boost logo

Boost Interest :

From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-27 10:08:21

David Abrahams wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> I thought cmake was supposed to be robust. This is very discouraging; it
>> implies cmake developers are only targeting folks who are cmake experts.
>> Is it possible to disable this misfeature?
> I think Troy is saying that we get to control what gets cached, and as
> our system gets more refined, we'll figure out what to cache and what
> not to.

Yeah. Don't panic.

> IIUC this is really the same model as autoconf and that has the same
> issue, but it's not a big problem for people... it's just that it's
> well-known how to blow away an autoconf cache.



Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at