Re: [Boost-cmake] Test feedback

From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-29 09:41:48

David Abrahams wrote:
> troy d. straszheim wrote:
> 
>> The test that causes this is just a program with a main() routine... It
>> seems like it should use boost.test, and boost.test should be
>> responsible for making these dialog-suppressing calls. (Does that sound
>> like it makes sense?)
> 
> 1. I'm reluctant to recommend that any program use Boost.Test until its
> documentation is made to correspond to its actual interface.
> 
> 2. You'd better ask Gennadiy what makes sense for Boost.Test; I don't
> understand the rationale by which it gets developed
> 
> 3. Maybe we could have an option in boost/detail/lightweight_test, or
> simply a separate header called boost/detail/regression.hpp that
> includes something that does this.  Maybe the old
> "dynamically-initialized static member of a template" trick makes sense
> here.
> 

Roger that, skipping to #3...

-t