Boost logo

Boost Interest :

Subject: Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-30 14:17:13

on Wed Oct 29 2008, "Doug Gregor" <> wrote:

>> I added some debugging into the BoostCore.cmake modularization code so that
>> I can try and figure out what has been and has NOT been modularized. What I
>> am coming up with is 27 libraries have been modularized and there are 79
>> libraries. So that leaves 52 libraries to be modularized. Is that Correct?
> That sounds right. I suggest modularizing from the leaves, and
> avoiding trying to modularize those libraries that are tangled in the
> core of Boost-config, type_traits, MPL, preprocessor, etc.

Doug, what's your opinion of where that should go in the long run?
Should we leave it alone, or should we eventually break these things
down into modularizable pieces?

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at