Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

Subject: Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update
From: Michael Jackson (mike.jackson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-31 17:01:25

On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:

>>>>
>>>> What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in  
>>>> the
>>>> "boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ?
>>>
>>> Yeah, that's how I would do it.
>>
>> So are talking about modularizing what is left into "libs/core"  
>> then? I just
>> want to be really clear and certain before I make that move.
>
> Sorry, I was very unclear. I would like the remaining libs (mpl,
> type_traits, config, and whatever else is in that tangle)
> unmodularized for now. There *are* circular dependencies at the
> library level and they aren't trivial to untangle. It's better for the
> CMake effort to leave those in the non-modularized core and let the
> library authors sort out the dependencies later.

How my working directory stands now is that all the libraries are  
modularized.

The problem I know have is that according to the generated dependency  
graph there is only 1 circular between date_time, algorithm and regex.

MPL, Type_Traits and such _seem_ to be ok but I think that is probably  
a false report going on what you guys are telling me.

_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson                  mike.jackson_at_[hidden]
             www.bluequartz.net