[Boost-commit] svn:boost r41402 - trunk/status

From: nielsdekker_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-11-26 12:36:52

Author: niels_dekker
Date: 2007-11-26 12:36:52 EST (Mon, 26 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 41402
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/41402

Log:
Marked value_init_test failures on Borland C++ as "expected failures", as discussed with Fernando Cacciola.
Text files modified: 
   trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml |    16 ++++++++++++++++                        
   1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Modified: trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
==============================================================================
--- trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml	(original)
+++ trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml	2007-11-26 12:36:52 EST (Mon, 26 Nov 2007)
@@ -5409,6 +5409,22 @@
             </note>
         </mark-expected-failures>
         <mark-expected-failures>
+            <test name="value_init_test"/>
+            <toolset name="borland-5.6*"/>
+            <toolset name="borland-5.8*"/>
+            <toolset name="borland-5.9*"/>
+            <note author="Niels Dekker">
+                This test typically fails on Borland C++, because of an issue described by
+                <a href="http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1459">
+                ticket #1459, "value_initialized leaves data uninitialized,
+                when using Borland"</a>. The issue is caused by a 
+                compiler bug, reported at the website of Codegear/Borland:
+                <a href="http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=51854">
+                Report #51854, "Value-initialization: POD struct
+                should be zero-initialized"</a>.
+            </note>
+        </mark-expected-failures>
+        <mark-expected-failures>
             <test name="operators_test"/>
             <toolset name="gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64"/>
             <note author="Vladimir Prus">