|
Boost-Commit : |
From: nielsdekker_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-12-01 08:57:06
Author: niels_dekker
Date: 2007-12-01 08:57:06 EST (Sat, 01 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 41530
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/41530
Log:
Marked value_init_test failures on GCC as "expected failures", referring to ticket #1491
Text files modified:
trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Modified: trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
==============================================================================
--- trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml (original)
+++ trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml 2007-12-01 08:57:06 EST (Sat, 01 Dec 2007)
@@ -5434,6 +5434,26 @@
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
<mark-expected-failures>
+ <test name="value_init_test"/>
+ <toolset name="gcc-3.3*"/>
+ <toolset name="gcc-3.4*"/>
+ <toolset name="gcc-4.1*"/>
+ <toolset name="gcc-4.2*"/>
+ <toolset name="gcc-mingw-3.4*"/>
+ <note author="Niels Dekker">
+ This test typically fails on GCC, because of an issue described by
+ <a href="http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1491">
+ ticket #1491, "value_initialized leaves data uninitialized,
+ when using GCC"</a>. The issue is caused by some GCC compiler bugs:
+ <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111">
+ Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members</a>,
+ reported by Jonathan Wakely, and
+ <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916">
+ Default constructor fails to initialize array members</a>,
+ reported by Michael Elizabeth Chastain.
+ </note>
+ </mark-expected-failures>
+ <mark-expected-failures>
<test name="operators_test"/>
<toolset name="gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64"/>
<note author="Vladimir Prus">
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk