|
Boost-Commit : |
From: daniel_james_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-12-29 08:14:46
Author: danieljames
Date: 2007-12-29 08:14:45 EST (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 42335
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/42335
Log:
Some of the changes to the introduction mention in the review. Hopefully this
will make it a little clearer.
Text files modified:
branches/unordered/dev/libs/unordered/doc/intro.qbk | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Modified: branches/unordered/dev/libs/unordered/doc/intro.qbk
==============================================================================
--- branches/unordered/dev/libs/unordered/doc/intro.qbk (original)
+++ branches/unordered/dev/libs/unordered/doc/intro.qbk 2007-12-29 08:14:45 EST (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
@@ -28,11 +28,12 @@
Also, the existing containers require a 'less than' comparison object
to order their elements. For some data types this is impossible to implement
-or isn't practical. For a hash table you need an equality function
+or isn't practical. In contrast, a hash table only needs an equality function
and a hash function for the key.
-So the __tr1__ introduced the unordered associative containers, which are
-implemented using hash tables, and they have now been added to the __draft__.
+With this in mind, the __tr1__ introduced the unordered associative containers,
+which are implemented using hash tables, and they have now been added to the
+__draft__.
This library supplies an almost complete implementation of the specification in
the __draft__, (it doesn't support `emplace` yet, see the [link
@@ -110,6 +111,7 @@
three,3
missing,0
-There are other differences, which will be detailed later.
+There are other differences, which are listed in the
+[link unordered.comparison Comparison with Associative Containers] section.
[endsect]
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk