[Boost-commit] svn:boost r42582 - sandbox/committee/LWG

From: hinnant_at_[hidden]
Date: 2008-01-07 15:18:57

Author: hinnant
Date: 2008-01-07 15:18:57 EST (Mon, 07 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 42582
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/42582

Log:
V1 issue 43.

Text files modified: 
   sandbox/committee/LWG/issues.html         |     2 +-                                      
   sandbox/committee/LWG/thread_library.html |    20 ++++++--------------                    
   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/issues.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/issues.html	(original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/issues.html	2008-01-07 15:18:57 EST (Mon, 07 Jan 2008)
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
 <p>&#10004; 42. [thread.condition] (30.4), second sentence: this seems trivial.
 Should it
 end with &quot;executed serially in some unspecified order&quot;? </p>
-<p>43. [thread.condvar] (30.4.1), wait() without predicate: the second
+<p>&#9998; 43. [thread.condvar] (30.4.1), wait() without predicate: the second
 bullet
 item is convoluted. How about: &quot;The lock objects passed by all the
 threads

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/thread_library.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/thread_library.html	(original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/thread_library.html	2008-01-07 15:18:57 EST (Mon, 07 Jan 2008)
@@ -3075,13 +3075,9 @@
 No other thread is waiting on this <code>condition_variable</code> object, or
 </li>
 <li>
-The execution of the <code>mutex</code> member function
-on the <code>lock</code>
-objects supplied in the calls to <code>wait</code> or <code>timed_wait</code>
-in
-all the threads currently waiting on this <code>condition_variable</code> object
-would return the same value as <code>lock-&gt;mutex()</code>
-for this call to <code>wait</code>.
+The <code><var>lock</var></code> arguments supplied by all concurrently waiting
+threads (via <code>wait</code> or <code>timed_wait</code>) return
+the same value for <code><var>lock</var>.mutex()</code>.
 </li>
 </ul>
 </dd>
@@ -3164,13 +3160,9 @@
 No other thread is waiting on this <code>condition_variable</code> object, or
 </li>
 <li>
-The execution of the <code>mutex</code> member function
-on the <code><var>lock</var></code> objects
-supplied in the calls to <code>wait</code> or <code>timed_wait</code>
-in all the threads
-currently waiting on this <code>condition_variable</code> object
-would return the same value as <code><var>lock</var>-&gt;mutex()</code>
-for this call to <code>wait</code>.
+The <code><var>lock</var></code> arguments supplied by all concurrently waiting
+threads (via <code>wait</code> or <code>timed_wait</code>) return
+the same value for <code><var>lock</var>.mutex()</code>.
 </li>
 </ul>
 </dd>