Date: 2008-08-17 22:47:49
Date: 2008-08-17 22:47:48 EDT (Sun, 17 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 48188
- Minor corrections.
Text files modified:
sandbox/SOC/2008/spacial_indexing/libs/spatial_index/doc/performance_comparison.qbk | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- sandbox/SOC/2008/spacial_indexing/libs/spatial_index/doc/performance_comparison.qbk (original)
+++ sandbox/SOC/2008/spacial_indexing/libs/spatial_index/doc/performance_comparison.qbk 2008-08-17 22:47:48 EDT (Sun, 17 Aug 2008)
@@ -7,12 +7,13 @@
[section:performance_comparison Performance Comparison]
-In order to show the strenghts of each index we have run several tests
-comparing them with the same data sets to check both processor and
+In order to show the strenghts of each index we ran several tests
+with the same data sets to check both processor and
-Also we have compared our library with some well-known spatial indexing
-libraries. The results were really good in comparison.
+Additionaly, we have compared our library with some well-known spatial indexing
+libraries. The results were quite good.
[subsection:processor_times Data set]
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk