|
|
Boost-Commit : |
Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r50908 - in sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math: doc/sf_and_dist performance tools
From: john_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-01-30 12:26:06
Author: johnmaddock
Date: 2009-01-30 12:26:05 EST (Fri, 30 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 50908
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/50908
Log:
Added updated linux test results.
Added:
sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/performance/gcc-4.3.2-linux.log (contents, props changed)
Text files modified:
sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/doc/sf_and_dist/performance.qbk | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/tools/process_perf_results.cpp | 8 +++-
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Modified: sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/doc/sf_and_dist/performance.qbk
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/doc/sf_and_dist/performance.qbk (original)
+++ sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/doc/sf_and_dist/performance.qbk 2009-01-30 12:26:05 EST (Fri, 30 Jan 2009)
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@
[[__negative_binomial_distrib Quantile][[perf msvc-dist-negative_binomial-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (2.311e-005s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nbinom-R-quantile..[para 16.03[footnote The R library appears to use a linear-search strategy, that can perform very badly in a small number of pathological cases, but may or may not be more efficient in "typical" cases]][para (3.704e-004s)]]]]
[[__non_central_chi_squared_distrib CDF][[perf msvc-dist-non_central_chi_squared-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (4.274e-006s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nchisq-R-cdf..[para 34.09][para (1.457e-004s)]]]]
-[[__non_central_chi_squared_distrib Quantile][[perf msvc-dist-non_central_chi_squared-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (3.528e-004s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nchisq-R-quantile..[para 75.71][para (2.671e-002s)]]]]
+[[__non_central_chi_squared_distrib Quantile][[perf msvc-dist-non_central_chi_squared-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (3.528e-004s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nchisq-R-quantile..[para 75.71[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]][para (2.671e-002s)]]]]
[[__non_central_F_distrib CDF][[perf msvc-dist-non_central_f-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.182e-005s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nf-R-cdf..[para 1.51][para (1.781e-005s)]]]]
[[__non_central_F_distrib Quantile][[perf msvc-dist-non_central_f-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (4.822e-004s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nf-R-quantile..[para 3.99][para (1.924e-003s)]]]]
[[__non_central_t_distrib CDF][[perf msvc-dist-non_central_t-cdf..[para 3.58][para (1.937e-005s)]]][[perf msvc-dist-nt-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (5.411e-006s)]]]]
@@ -319,37 +319,51 @@
[heading Comparison to the R Statistical Library on Linux]
-All the results were measured on a 2.8GHz Intel Pentium 4, 2Gb RAM, Mandriva Linux
-machine, with the test program and R-2.5.0 compiled with GNU G++ 4.2.0.
+All the results were measured on a 2.0GHz Intel T5800 Core 2 Duo, 4Gb RAM, Ubuntu Linux 8.1
+machine, with the test program and R-2.8.1 compiled with GNU G++ 4.3.2 using -O3.
[table A Comparison to the R Statistical Library on Linux
[[Statistical Function][Boost][R]]
-[[__beta_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-beta-cdf..[para 1.71][para (3.508e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-beta-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (2.050e-006s)]]]]
-[[__beta_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-beta-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.294e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-beta-R-quantile..[para 44.06[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]][para (5.701e-004s)]]]]
-[[__binomial_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-binomial-cdf..[para 1.22][para (1.342e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-binom-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.104e-006s)]]]]
-[[__binomial_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-binomial-quantile..[para 1.36][para (7.083e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-binom-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (5.194e-006s)]]]]
-[[__cauchy_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-cauchy-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.372e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-cauchy-R-cdf..[para 1.47][para (2.017e-007s)]]]]
-[[__cauchy_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-cauchy-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.542e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-cauchy-R-quantile..[para 1.14][para (1.752e-007s)]]]]
-[[__chi_squared_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-chi_squared-cdf..[para 1.04][para (1.820e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-chisq-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.753e-006s)]]]]
-[[__chi_squared_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-chi_squared-quantile..[para 1.39][para (9.345e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-chisq-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (6.728e-006s)]]]]
-[[__exp_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-exponential-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (2.195e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-exp-R-cdf..[para 1.17][para (2.561e-007s)]]]]
-[[__exp_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-exponential-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.123e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-exp-R-quantile..[para 1.03][para (1.155e-007s)]]]]
-[[__F_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-fisher_f-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (2.744e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-f-R-cdf..[para 1.08][para (2.970e-006s)]]]]
-[[__F_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-fisher_f-quantile..[para 1.14][para (1.550e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-f-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.359e-005s)]]]]
-[[__gamma_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-gamma-cdf..[para 1.29][para (2.578e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-gamma-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.992e-006s)]]]]
-[[__gamma_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-gamma-quantile..[para 1.77][para (1.020e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-gamma-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (5.757e-006s)]]]]
-[[__lognormal_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-lognormal-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.782e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-lnorm-R-cdf..[para 2.00][para (3.564e-007s)]]]]
-[[__lognormal_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-lognormal-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (7.093e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-lnorm-R-quantile..[para 1.07][para (7.607e-007s)]]]]
-[[__negative_binomial_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-negative_binomial-cdf..[para 1.03][para (2.209e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-nbinom-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (2.141e-006s)]]]]
-[[__negative_binomial_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-negative_binomial-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.826e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-nbinom-R-quantile..[para 30.07[footnote The R library appears to use a linear-search strategy, that can perform very badly in a small number of pathological cases, but may or may not be more efficient in "typical" cases]][para (5.490e-004s)]]]]
-[[__normal_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-normal-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (8.542e-008s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-norm-R-cdf..[para 2.09][para (1.782e-007s)]]]]
-[[__normal_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-normal-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.362e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-norm-R-quantile..[para 1.26][para (1.722e-007s)]]]]
-[[__poisson_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-poisson-cdf..[para 1.10][para (1.953e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-pois-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.775e-006s)]]]]
-[[__poisson_distrib][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-poisson-quantile..[para 1.12][para (4.214e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-pois-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (3.752e-006s)]]]]
-[[__students_t_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-students_t-cdf..[para 1.55][para (2.441e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-t-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.576e-006s)]]]]
-[[__students_t_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-students_t-quantile..[para 1.33][para (3.972e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-t-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (2.990e-006s)]]]]
-[[__weibull_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-weibull-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (6.640e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-weibull-R-cdf..[para 1.06][para (7.031e-007s)]]]]
-[[__weibull_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-weibull-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (7.504e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_2-dist-weibull-R-quantile..[para 1.03][para (7.710e-007s)]]]]
+[[__beta_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-cdf..[para 2.35][para (3.371e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.435e-006s)]]]]
+[[__beta_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.093e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-R-quantile..[para 31.61[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]][para (3.455e-004s)]]]]
+[[__binomial_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-binomial-cdf..[para 1.33][para (8.835e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-binom-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (6.626e-007s)]]]]
+[[__binomial_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-binomial-quantile..[para 1.73][para (6.532e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-binom-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (3.777e-006s)]]]]
+[[__cauchy_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-cdf..[para 1.23][para (1.856e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.513e-007s)]]]]
+[[__cauchy_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-quantile..[para 1.46][para (2.009e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.378e-007s)]]]]
+[[__chi_squared_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-chi_squared-cdf..[para 1.25][para (1.354e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-chisq-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.087e-006s)]]]]
+[[__chi_squared_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-chi_squared-quantile..[para 1.80][para (9.906e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-chisq-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (5.514e-006s)]]]]
+[[__exp_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-exponential-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.250e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-exp-R-cdf..[para 1.29][para (1.616e-007s)]]]]
+[[__exp_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-exponential-quantile..[para 1.02][para (9.310e-008s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-exp-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (9.149e-008s)]]]]
+[[__F_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-fisher_f-cdf..[para 1.65][para (2.292e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-f-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.388e-006s)]]]]
+[[__F_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-fisher_f-quantile..[para 1.78][para (1.740e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-f-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (9.787e-006s)]]]]
+[[__gamma_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-cdf..[para 1.48][para (1.816e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.230e-006s)]]]]
+[[__gamma_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (8.553e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-R-quantile..[para 1.62][para (1.382e-005s)]]]]
+
+[[__hypergeometric_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeometric-cdf..[para 2.25[footnote This result is somewhat misleading: for small values of the parameters there is virtually no difference between the two libraries, but for large values the Boost implementation is /much/ slower, albeit with much improved precision.]][para (3.308e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeo-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.467e-007s)]]]]
+[[__hypergeometric_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeometric-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (6.179e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeo-R-quantile..[para 3.24][para (2.002e-006s)]]]]
+[[__logistic_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-logistic-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.172e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-logis-R-cdf..[para 2.08][para (2.441e-007s)]]]]
+[[__logistic_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-logistic-quantile..[para 1.15][para (1.362e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-logis-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.182e-007s)]]]]
+
+[[__lognormal_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-lognormal-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (2.124e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-lnorm-R-cdf..[para 1.13][para (2.392e-007s)]]]]
+[[__lognormal_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-lognormal-quantile..[para 3.16][para (1.460e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-lnorm-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (4.626e-007s)]]]]
+[[__negative_binomial_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-negative_binomial-cdf..[para 1.27][para (1.665e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbinom-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.308e-006s)]]]]
+[[__negative_binomial_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-negative_binomial-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.794e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbinom-R-quantile..[para 22.46[footnote The R library appears to use a linear-search strategy, that can perform very badly in a small number of pathological cases, but may or may not be more efficient in "typical" cases]][para (4.029e-004s)]]]]
+
+[[__non_central_chi_squared_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_chi_squared-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.085e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nchisq-R-cdf..[para 13.52][para (1.467e-004s)]]]]
+[[__non_central_chi_squared_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_chi_squared-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (2.031e-003s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nchisq-R-quantile..[para 15.65[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]][para (3.179e-002s)]]]]
+[[__non_central_F_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_f-cdf..[para 7.14][para (6.198e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nf-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (8.678e-006s)]]]]
+[[__non_central_F_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_f-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (7.947e-004s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nf-R-quantile..[para 1.21][para (9.622e-004s)]]]]
+[[__non_central_t_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_t-cdf..[para 5.70][para (3.461e-005s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nt-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (6.069e-006s)]]]]
+[[__non_central_t_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_t-quantile..[para 1.80][para (9.308e-004s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-nt-R-quantile..[para *1.00*[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]][para (5.176e-004s)]]]]
+
+[[__normal_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-normal-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.245e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-norm-R-cdf..[para 1.04][para (1.294e-007s)]]]]
+[[__normal_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-normal-quantile..[para 1.59][para (2.364e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-norm-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (1.490e-007s)]]]]
+[[__poisson_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-poisson-cdf..[para 1.22][para (1.354e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-pois-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (1.110e-006s)]]]]
+[[__poisson_distrib][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-poisson-quantile..[para 1.38][para (3.752e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-pois-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (2.724e-006s)]]]]
+[[__students_t_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-students_t-cdf..[para 2.32][para (2.108e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-t-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (9.099e-007s)]]]]
+[[__students_t_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-students_t-quantile..[para 1.21][para (4.018e-006s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-t-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (3.317e-006s)]]]]
+[[__weibull_distrib CDF][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-cdf..[para 1.04][para (3.955e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-R-cdf..[para *1.00*][para (3.808e-007s)]]]]
+[[__weibull_distrib Quantile][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-quantile..[para 1.06][para (4.472e-007s)]]][[perf gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-R-quantile..[para *1.00*][para (4.215e-007s)]]]]
]
[endsect]
@@ -384,3 +398,8 @@
+
+
+
+
+
Added: sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/performance/gcc-4.3.2-linux.log
==============================================================================
--- (empty file)
+++ sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/performance/gcc-4.3.2-linux.log 2009-01-30 12:26:05 EST (Fri, 30 Jan 2009)
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-R-cdf 1.435e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-R-pdf 1.059e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-R-quantile 3.455e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-cdf 3.371e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-pdf 1.754e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-quantile 1.093e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-binom-R-cdf 6.626e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-binom-R-pdf 4.333e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-binom-R-quantile 3.777e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-binomial-cdf 8.835e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-binomial-pdf 1.274e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-binomial-quantile 6.532e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-R-cdf 1.513e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-R-pdf 6.456e-08
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-R-quantile 1.378e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-cdf 1.856e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-pdf 7.364e-08
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-cauchy-quantile 2.009e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-chi_squared-cdf 1.354e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-chi_squared-pdf 1.332e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-chi_squared-quantile 9.906e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-chisq-R-cdf 1.087e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-chisq-R-pdf 3.827e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-chisq-R-quantile 5.514e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-exp-R-cdf 1.616e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-exp-R-pdf 1.830e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-exp-R-quantile 9.149e-08
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-exponential-cdf 1.250e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-exponential-pdf 1.433e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-exponential-quantile 9.310e-08
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-f-R-cdf 1.388e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-f-R-pdf 6.618e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-f-R-quantile 9.787e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-fisher_f-cdf 2.292e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-fisher_f-pdf 1.485e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-fisher_f-quantile 1.740e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-R-cdf 1.230e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-R-pdf 5.371e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-R-quantile 1.382e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-cdf 1.816e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-pdf 1.387e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-gamma-quantile 8.553e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeo-R-cdf 1.467e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeo-R-pdf 1.921e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeo-R-quantile 2.002e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeometric-cdf 3.308e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeometric-pdf 2.935e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeometric-quantile 6.179e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-lnorm-R-cdf 2.392e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-lnorm-R-pdf 2.637e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-lnorm-R-quantile 4.626e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-logis-R-cdf 2.441e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-logis-R-pdf 1.953e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-logis-R-quantile 1.182e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-logistic-cdf 1.172e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-logistic-pdf 1.465e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-logistic-quantile 1.362e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-lognormal-cdf 2.124e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-lognormal-pdf 6.933e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-lognormal-quantile 1.460e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbeta-R-cdf 2.738e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbeta-R-pdf 4.959e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbeta-R-quantile 9.569e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbinom-R-cdf 1.308e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbinom-R-pdf 7.816e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbinom-R-quantile 4.029e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nchisq-R-cdf 1.467e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nchisq-R-pdf 2.002e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nchisq-R-quantile 3.179e-02
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-negative_binomial-cdf 1.665e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-negative_binomial-pdf 2.379e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-negative_binomial-quantile 1.794e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nf-R-cdf 8.678e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nf-R-pdf 1.426e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nf-R-quantile 9.622e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_beta-cdf 3.461e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_beta-pdf 4.236e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_beta-quantile 7.869e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_chi_squared-cdf 1.085e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_chi_squared-pdf 3.461e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_chi_squared-quantile 2.031e-03
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_f-cdf 6.198e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_f-pdf 7.521e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_f-quantile 7.947e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_t-cdf 3.461e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_t-pdf 3.461e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-non_central_t-quantile 9.308e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-norm-R-cdf 1.294e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-norm-R-pdf 1.977e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-norm-R-quantile 1.490e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-normal-cdf 1.245e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-normal-pdf 1.929e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-normal-quantile 2.364e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nt-R-cdf 6.069e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nt-R-pdf 1.291e-05
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-nt-R-quantile 5.176e-04
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-pois-R-cdf 1.110e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-pois-R-pdf 4.216e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-pois-R-quantile 2.724e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-poisson-cdf 1.354e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-poisson-pdf 2.064e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-poisson-quantile 3.752e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-students_t-cdf 2.108e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-students_t-pdf 1.820e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-students_t-quantile 4.018e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-t-R-cdf 9.099e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-t-R-pdf 5.381e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-t-R-quantile 3.317e-06
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-R-cdf 3.808e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-R-pdf 5.469e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-R-quantile 4.215e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-cdf 3.955e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-pdf 8.105e-07
+Testing gcc-4_3_2-dist-weibull-quantile 4.472e-07
+
Modified: sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/tools/process_perf_results.cpp
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/tools/process_perf_results.cpp (original)
+++ sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/tools/process_perf_results.cpp 2009-01-30 12:26:05 EST (Fri, 30 Jan 2009)
@@ -37,10 +37,14 @@
//
extra_text["msvc-dist-beta-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
extra_text["msvc-dist-nbinom-R-quantile"] = "[footnote The R library appears to use a linear-search strategy, that can perform very badly in a small number of pathological cases, but may or may not be more efficient in \"typical\" cases]";
- extra_text["gcc-4_2-dist-beta-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
- extra_text["gcc-4_2-dist-nbinom-R-quantile"] = "[footnote The R library appears to use a linear-search strategy, that can perform very badly in a small number of pathological cases, but may or may not be more efficient in \"typical\" cases]";
+ extra_text["gcc-4_3_2-dist-beta-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
+ extra_text["gcc-4_3_2-dist-nbinom-R-quantile"] = "[footnote The R library appears to use a linear-search strategy, that can perform very badly in a small number of pathological cases, but may or may not be more efficient in \"typical\" cases]";
extra_text["msvc-dist-hypergeometric-cdf"] = "[footnote This result is somewhat misleading: for small values of the parameters there is virtually no difference between the two libraries, but for large values the Boost implementation is /much/ slower, albeit with much improved precision.]";
extra_text["msvc-dist-nt-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
+ extra_text["msvc-dist-nchisq-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
+ extra_text["gcc-4_3_2-dist-hypergeometric-cdf"] = "[footnote This result is somewhat misleading: for small values of the parameters there is virtually no difference between the two libraries, but for large values the Boost implementation is /much/ slower, albeit with much improved precision.]";
+ extra_text["gcc-4_3_2-dist-nt-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
+ extra_text["gcc-4_3_2-dist-nchisq-R-quantile"] = "[footnote There are a small number of our test cases where the R library fails to converge on a result: these tend to dominate the performance result.]";
boost::regex e("^Testing\\s+(\\S+)\\s+(\\S+)");
std::string f;
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk