Boost-Commit :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r51584 - sandbox/committee/LWG
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-03-03 18:13:44

Next message: eric_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r51585 - in trunk/libs/proto/doc: . reference/transform"
Previous message: afojgo_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r51583 - in sandbox/itl/libs/itl: build/cygwin doc"

Author: bemandawes
Date: 2009-03-03 18:13:43 EST (Tue, 03 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 51584
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/51584

Log:
Tuesday 6 pm
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html 2009-03-03 18:13:43 EST (Tue, 03 Mar 2009)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
<h1>Library Working Group 
Status of CD1 National Body Comments</h1>
Revised:
-03 Mar 2009 01:38:25 PM -0500
+03 Mar 2009 05:41:54 PM -0500

<table border="1" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="7"
 cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse">
@@ -3806,6 +3806,8 @@
 <td>
 

+ [meta.trans.other]
+
 Agree that aligned_union is not completely redundant. We are investigating
 whether the need for aligned_union is compelling enough to reinstate.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -4533,6 +4535,8 @@
 <td>
 

+ [default.allocator]
+
 Agree as stated. A future paper will address additional related issues.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 UK 
@@ -4832,7 +4836,7 @@

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
- US 74
+ US 74.1

 <td>
 20.8
@@ -4906,7 +4910,7 @@

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
- US 74(2)
+ US 74.2

 <td>
 20.8.2.2
@@ -5126,7 +5130,10 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ [unique.ptr], [util.smartptr.shared] We look forward to
+ a paper on this topic. We recommend no action until a paper is
+ available. We believe that the shared pointer must use the default
+ deleter for the conversion to succeed. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -5168,7 +5175,9 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ [unique.ptr.single.ctor] Agree. The unique_ptr(pointer
+ p) Requires clause should be the same as the unique_ptr() 
+ Requires clause. Note that unique_ptr [unique.ptr] needs concepts. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -5199,7 +5208,9 @@
 a null pionter" at the requires.

 <td>
- 
+ [util.smartptr.shared.atomic] Agree. All of the
+ functions need a requirement that p (or v) is a pointer to a valid
+ object. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -5238,7 +5249,9 @@
 30.

 <td>
- 
+ [time] We agree that this section needs concepts. We
+ look forward to a paper on this topic. We recommend no action until a
+ paper is available. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -5270,7 +5283,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ 20.8.2.1 [time.traits.is_fp] Agree. The section name and the section label
+ ([time.traits.is_fp]) are wrong. Forward to project editor.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 US 81

@@ -5385,7 +5399,9 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ [time.duration] Agree except that there is a typo in the
+ proposed resolution. The member operators should be operator%=. This is
+ also LWG issue 934. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -5410,7 +5426,7 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ [time.clock.hires] Agree. Forward to project editor.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 UK 
 216
@@ -7431,7 +7447,7 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ [container.requirements] Agree in principle. We suggest proposed wording:<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 JP 55

@@ -7492,7 +7508,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ [container.requirements.general] Agree. Proposed wording will be presented
+ in N2829 or D2840.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 UK 
 224
@@ -7522,7 +7539,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ [container.requirements.general] Agree except with moving array to clause
+ 20. Proposed wording will be presented in D2840.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 UK 
 225
@@ -7587,7 +7605,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ [container.requirements.general] Agree. The proposed resolution is
+ incomplete. Further work required.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 UK 
 227
@@ -7705,7 +7724,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ [container.requirements.dataraces] After considerable discussion and
+ consideration, we do not feel this is a defect given the reference to [res.on.data.races].<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 JP 56

@@ -8517,7 +8537,7 @@
 default value for postincrement_result

 <td>
- 
+ Howard will open an issue. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8553,7 +8573,7 @@
 ForwardIterator concept

 <td>
- 
+ Alisdair will open an issue. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8639,7 +8659,7 @@
 definition as an axiom

 <td>
- 
+ deferred until we know whether we have axioms. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8667,7 +8687,7 @@
 definition as an axiom

 <td>
- 
+ deferred until we know whether we have axioms. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8695,7 +8715,7 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ deferred until we know whether we have axioms. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8725,7 +8745,7 @@
 postincrement_result = X;

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, postdecrement_result is deduced. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8754,7 +8774,7 @@
 default value for postincrement_result

 <td>
- 
+ Howard will open an issue. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8785,7 +8805,7 @@
 postdecrement_result >;

 <td>
- 
+ NAD unless Alisdair comes back with more motivation. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8816,7 +8836,7 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ deferred for axiom decision. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8847,7 +8867,7 @@
 implementaiton.

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, violates complexity requirements. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8874,7 +8894,7 @@
 typename subscript_reference = reference;

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, subscript reference isn’t used. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8904,7 +8924,8 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ default implementation already in Standard; axiom part
+ deferred. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8934,7 +8955,7 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ Alisdair will open an issue, axiom part deferred. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8962,7 +8983,7 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ deferred/axiom. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -8990,7 +9011,7 @@
 Strike the Effects clause

 <td>
- 
+ Doug will open issue…strike effect, returns n. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9019,7 +9040,8 @@
 

 <td>
- 
+ default definition is not implementable; axiom part
+ deferred. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9047,7 +9069,7 @@
 the RandomAccessIterator concept

 <td>
- 
+ deferred/axiom. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9272,7 +9294,8 @@
 and RandomAccessRange.

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, beyond the scope of the Standard because we are not
+ supplying range-based algorithms. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9328,7 +9351,7 @@
 either direction for RandomAccessIterator

 <td>
- 
+ Howard will open an issue. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9358,7 +9381,7 @@
 FOrwardIterator in next and prev function templates.

 <td>
- 
+ Alisdair will open an issue. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9399,7 +9422,7 @@
 move_iterator specification.

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, no consensus. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9465,7 +9488,7 @@
 taking a single Iterator argument should be explicit.

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, withdrawn by submitter. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9494,7 +9517,7 @@
 difference_type argument non-member operators

 <td>
- 
+ NAD, not editorial, withdrawn by submitter. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -9532,7 +9555,7 @@
 nature of a value-initialized reserve iterator.

 <td>
- 
+ agree with option i, Alisdair will open an issue. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -12429,7 +12452,8 @@

 <td>
 Create an issue. Assigned to Lawrence. Resolution
- requires proposed wording. 
+ requires proposed wording.Later: Mark as Not A Defect.
+ We can not see the issue being suggested by the comment. 

 <tr valign="top">
 <td>
@@ -12860,7 +12884,9 @@
 <td>
 

- Create an issue. To be discussed in full library group.<tr valign="top">
+ Create an issue. To be discussed in full library group.
+
+ Later: straw poll 10-0, put N2802 Alternative 2 on formal motions page.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 US 98

@@ -13788,7 +13814,7 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ DE 23: Create issue, share with DE 25. See N2826. Attention: core group.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 DE-24

@@ -13813,7 +13839,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ Create issue, proposed resolution as in comment. Attention: LWG subgroup 2.
+ Note the section in N2800 is actually 20.6.12.1.4 [func.bind.place].<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 DE-25

@@ -13844,7 +13871,7 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ DE 25: Create issue, share with DE 23. Attention: core group.<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 FR 38

@@ -13907,7 +13934,8 @@
 <td>
 

- <tr valign="top">
+ Deals with deprecation, needs to be discussed in general group. Attention:
+ Bill Plaugher<tr valign="top">
 <td>
 FR 39

Next message: eric_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r51585 - in trunk/libs/proto/doc: . reference/transform"
Previous message: afojgo_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r51583 - in sandbox/itl/libs/itl: build/cygwin doc"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk