Boost logo

Boost-Commit :

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r52562 - trunk/boost/graph
From: asutton_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-04-23 10:19:19


Author: asutton
Date: 2009-04-23 10:19:19 EDT (Thu, 23 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 52562
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/52562

Log:
Added preliminary version of transitive_reduction. This has no test or
documentation, and needs to be thoroughly reviewed.

Added:
   trunk/boost/graph/transitive_reduction.hpp (contents, props changed)

Added: trunk/boost/graph/transitive_reduction.hpp
==============================================================================
--- (empty file)
+++ trunk/boost/graph/transitive_reduction.hpp 2009-04-23 10:19:19 EDT (Thu, 23 Apr 2009)
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+// (C) Copyright 2009 Eric Bose-Wolf
+//
+// Use, modification and distribution are subject to the
+// Boost Software License, Version 1.0 (See accompanying file
+// LICENSE_1_0.txt or http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
+
+#ifndef BOOST_GRAPH_TRANSITIVE_REDUCTION_HPP
+#define BOOST_GRAPH_TRANSITIVE_REDUCTION_HPP
+
+#include <vector>
+#include <algorithm> //std::find
+#include <boost/concept/requires.hpp>
+#include <boost/concept_check.hpp>
+
+#include <boost/graph/graph_traits.hpp>
+#include <boost/graph/topological_sort.hpp>
+
+// also I didn't got all of the concepts thin. Am I suppose to check
+// for all concepts, which are needed for functions I call? (As if I
+// wouldn't do that, the users would see the functions called by
+// complaining about missings concepts, which would be clearly an error
+// message revealing internal implementation and should therefore be avoided?)
+
+// the pseudocode which I followed implementing this algorithmn was taken
+// from the german book Algorithmische Graphentheorie by Volker Turau
+// it is proposed to be of O(n + nm_red ) where n is the number
+// of vertices and m_red is the number of edges in the transitive
+// reduction, but I think my implementation spoiled this up at some point
+// indicated below.
+
+namespace boost {
+
+template <
+ typename Graph, typename GraphTR, typename G_to_TR_VertexMap,
+ typename VertexIndexMap
+>
+BOOST_CONCEPT_REQUIRES(
+ ((VertexListGraphConcept< Graph >))
+ ((IncidenceGraphConcept< Graph >))
+ ((MutableGraphConcept< GraphTR >))
+ ((ReadablePropertyMapConcept< VertexIndexMap,
+ typename graph_traits<Graph>::vertex_descriptor >))
+ ((Integer< typename
+ property_traits< VertexIndexMap >::value_type >))
+ ((LvaluePropertyMapConcept< G_to_TR_VertexMap,
+ typename graph_traits<Graph>::vertex_descriptor >)),
+ (void))
+transitive_reduction(const Graph& g, GraphTR& tr,
+ G_to_TR_VertexMap g_to_tr_map,
+ VertexIndexMap g_index_map )
+{
+ typedef typename graph_traits<Graph>::vertex_descriptor Vertex;
+ typedef typename graph_traits<Graph>::vertex_iterator VertexIterator;
+ typedef typename std::vector<Vertex>::size_type size_type;
+
+ std::vector<Vertex> topo_order;
+ topological_sort(g, std::back_inserter(topo_order));
+
+ std::vector<size_type> topo_number_storage(num_vertices(g));
+
+ iterator_property_map<size_type*, VertexIndexMap,
+ size_type, size_type&> topo_number( &topo_number_storage[0], g_index_map );
+
+ {
+ typename std::vector<Vertex>::reverse_iterator it = topo_order.rbegin();
+ size_type n = 0;
+ for(; it != topo_order.rend(); ++it,++n ) {
+ topo_number[ *it ] = n;
+ }
+ }
+
+ std::vector< std::vector< bool > > edge_in_closure(num_vertices(g),
+ std::vector<bool>( num_vertices(g), false));
+ {
+ typename std::vector<Vertex>::reverse_iterator it = topo_order.rbegin();
+ for( ; it != topo_order.rend(); ++it ) {
+ g_to_tr_map[*it] = add_vertex(tr);
+ }
+ }
+
+ typename std::vector<Vertex>::iterator
+ it = topo_order.begin(),
+ end = topo_order.end();
+ for( ; it != end; ++it ) {
+ size_type i = topo_number[ *it ];
+ edge_in_closure[i][i] = true;
+ std::vector<Vertex> neighbors;
+
+ //I have to collect the successors of *it and traverse them in
+ //ascending topological order. I didn't know a better way, how to
+ //do that. So what I'm doint is, collection the successors of *it here
+ {
+ typename Graph::out_edge_iterator oi,oi_end;
+ for( tie(oi, oi_end) = out_edges( *it, g ); oi != oi_end; ++oi ) {
+ neighbors.push_back( target( *oi, g ) );
+ }
+ }
+
+ {
+ //and run through all vertices in topological order
+ typename std::vector<Vertex>::reverse_iterator
+ rit = topo_order.rbegin();
+ rend = topo_order.rend();
+ for(; rit != rend; ++rit ) {
+ //looking if they are successors of *it
+ if( std::find( neighbors.begin(), neighbors.end(), *rit) != neighbors.end() ) {
+ size_type j = topo_number[ *rit ];
+ if( not edge_in_closure[i][j] ) {
+ for(size_type k = j; k < num_vertices(g); ++k) {
+ if( not edge_in_closure[i][k] ) {
+ //here we need edge_in_closure to be in topological order,
+ edge_in_closure[i][k] = edge_in_closure[j][k];
+ }
+ }
+ //therefore we only access edge_in_closure only through
+ //topo_number property_map
+ add_edge(g_to_tr_map[*it], g_to_tr_map[*rit], tr);
+ } //if ( not edge_in_
+ } //if (find (
+ } //for( typename vector<Vertex>::reverse_iterator
+ } // {
+
+ } //for( typename vector<Vertex>::iterator
+
+} //void transitive_reduction
+
+} // namespace boost
+
+#endif
+


Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk