Boost logo

Boost-Commit :

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r53850 - sandbox/monotonic/libs/monotonic/doc
From: christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-06-13 00:35:13

Author: cschladetsch
Date: 2009-06-13 00:35:13 EDT (Sat, 13 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 53850

gah, lost </pre> tag

Text files modified:
   sandbox/monotonic/libs/monotonic/doc/index.html | 4 ++--
   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/monotonic/libs/monotonic/doc/index.html
--- sandbox/monotonic/libs/monotonic/doc/index.html (original)
+++ sandbox/monotonic/libs/monotonic/doc/index.html 2009-06-13 00:35:13 EDT (Sat, 13 Jun 2009)
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@
                 It has been strongly suggested that these convenience structures be removed from
                 the proposal. For comparison, the following are two exactly equivalent types:</p>
             <pre>typedef boost::monotonic::map&lt;int, boost::monotonic::list&lt;int&gt; &gt; Map;
-typedef std::map&lt;int, std::list&lt;int, boost::monotonic::allocator&lt;int&gt;,
- std::less, boost::monotonic::allocator&lt;int&gt; &gt; Map;</pre><p>
+typedef std::map&lt;int, std::list&lt;int, boost::monotonic::allocator&lt;int&gt; &gt;, std::less, boost::monotonic::allocator&lt;int&gt; &gt; Map;</pre>
+ &gt;<p>
                 The matter can be argued either way. The container-wrappers currently remain
                 part of the proposal, but this may change.</p>
             <h2 id="Architecture">

Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at