|
Boost-Commit : |
Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r54569 - trunk/libs/xpressive/doc
From: eric_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-07-01 18:34:10
Author: eric_niebler
Date: 2009-07-01 18:34:09 EDT (Wed, 01 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 54569
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/54569
Log:
order the tips according to their importance
Text files modified:
trunk/libs/xpressive/doc/tips_n_tricks.qbk | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Modified: trunk/libs/xpressive/doc/tips_n_tricks.qbk
==============================================================================
--- trunk/libs/xpressive/doc/tips_n_tricks.qbk (original)
+++ trunk/libs/xpressive/doc/tips_n_tricks.qbk 2009-07-01 18:34:09 EDT (Wed, 01 Jul 2009)
@@ -9,11 +9,17 @@
Squeeze the most performance out of xpressive with these tips and tricks.
-[h2 Use Static Regexes]
+[h2 Compile Patterns Once And Reuse Them]
-On average, static regexes execute about 10 to 15% faster than their
-dynamic counterparts. It's worth familiarizing yourself with the static
-regex dialect.
+Compiling a regex (dynamic or static) is /far/ more expensive than executing a
+match or search. If you have the option, prefer to compile a pattern into
+a _basic_regex_ object once and reuse it rather than recreating it over
+and over.
+
+Since _basic_regex_ objects are not mutated by any of the regex algorithms, they
+are completely thread-safe once their initialization (and that of any grammars of
+which they are members) completes. The easiest way to reuse your patterns is
+to simply make your _basic_regex_ objects "static const".
[h2 Reuse _match_results_ Objects]
@@ -44,12 +50,11 @@
you can avoid this overhead by calling the regex algorithms with a `[begin, end)`
pair.
-[h2 Compile Patterns Once And Reuse Them]
+[h2 Use Static Regexes]
-Compiling a regex (dynamic or static) is more expensive than executing a
-match or search. If you have the option, prefer to compile a pattern into
-a _basic_regex_ object once and reuse it rather than recreating it over
-and over.
+On average, static regexes execute about 10 to 15% faster than their
+dynamic counterparts. It's worth familiarizing yourself with the static
+regex dialect.
[h2 Understand [^syntax_option_type::optimize]]
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk