[Boost-commit] svn:boost r54759 - sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r54759 - sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals
From: dgregor_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-07-07 01:16:53

Author: dgregor
Date: 2009-07-07 01:16:52 EDT (Tue, 07 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 54759
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/54759

Log:
Don't use the term Mat's Mechanism
Text files modified: 
   sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst |     6 +++---                                  
   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst	(original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst	2009-07-07 01:16:52 EDT (Tue, 07 Jul 2009)
@@ -341,8 +341,8 @@
 
     …etc…
 
-This style, sometimes called “Mat's Mechanism,” [#mat]_ has a number
-of expressive advantages over the “traditional” approach:
+This map-centric style [#mat]_ has a number of expressive advantages
+over the “traditional” approach:
 
 * It groups the operations associated with modeling a concept
   together, within the concept map.
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@
 
 An adaptive ``concept_map`` is always explicitly written.  Syntax
 adaptation is most commonly associated with post-hoc mapping, but can
-be done intentionally as part of Mat's Mechanism.
+be done intentionally as part of the map-centric style.
 
 Because they don't have syntax with widespread acceptance, post-hoc
 mapping of nontrivial concepts is highly likely to be both explicit