|
Boost-Commit : |
Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r54761 - sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals
From: dgregor_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-07-07 01:23:13
Author: dgregor
Date: 2009-07-07 01:23:13 EDT (Tue, 07 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 54761
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/54761
Log:
Rename the summary
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/proposals/taxonomy-of-concepts-and-maps.rst 2009-07-07 01:23:13 EDT (Tue, 07 Jul 2009)
@@ -433,8 +433,8 @@
mapping of nontrivial concepts is highly likely to be both explicit
and adaptive.
-Summary
-=======
+When to Use Auto or Non-Auto Concepts?
+======================================
Unfortunately, with the exception of syntactic concepts, deciding
whether to make a concept ``auto`` is not cut-and-dried.
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk