[Boost-commit] svn:boost r58753 - branches/release/status

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r58753 - branches/release/status
From: john_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-01-06 05:34:21

Author: johnmaddock
Date: 2010-01-06 05:34:20 EST (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 58753
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/58753

Log:
Add markup for new tests and VC-7.1
Text files modified: 
   branches/release/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml |    23 +++++++++++++++++++++--                 
   1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Modified: branches/release/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
==============================================================================
--- branches/release/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml	(original)
+++ branches/release/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml	2010-01-06 05:34:20 EST (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
@@ -4987,7 +4987,17 @@
 
     <!-- type_traits -->
     <library name="type_traits">
-        <mark-expected-failures>
+       <mark-expected-failures>
+          <test name="has_operator_new_test"/>
+          <test name="make_signed_test"/>
+          <test name="make_unsigned_test"/>
+          <toolset name="msvc-7.1"/>
+          <note author="John Maddock">
+             Apparently the compiler can't cope with these - later versions are fine though.
+             Probably work-round-able if someone would care to look into these.
+          </note>
+       </mark-expected-failures>
+       <mark-expected-failures>
             <test name="function_traits_test"/>
             <test name="remove_bounds_test"/>
             <test name="remove_const_test"/>
@@ -5216,7 +5226,16 @@
                 work by someone who has this compiler.
             </note>
         </mark-unusable>
-        <mark-expected-failures>
+       <mark-expected-failures>
+          <test name="test_type_traits"/>
+          <test name="std_test_type_traits"/>
+          <toolset name="msvc-7.1"/>
+          <note author="John Maddock">
+             Later versions of MSVC are required for these tests - the issues may
+             be work-round-able if anyone cares enough to look into them.
+          </note>
+       </mark-expected-failures>
+       <mark-expected-failures>
             <test name="test_mem_fn_tricky"/>
             <test name="test_bind_tricky"/>
             <test name="test_ref_wrapper_tricky"/>