Boost-Commit :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r60558 - sandbox/committee/LWG/cd_status
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-03-13 11:04:48

Author: bemandawes
Date: 2010-03-13 11:04:47 EST (Sat, 13 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 60558
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/60558

Log:
Presumed Pittsburgh LWG resolutions (except LWG 1153 still to come).
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/cd_status/comments.xml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/cd_status/comments.xml
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/cd_status/comments.xml (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/cd_status/comments.xml 2010-03-13 11:04:47 EST (Sat, 13 Mar 2010)
@@ -6664,7 +6664,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="FR" num="2" uknum="" type="ge" owner="LWG" issue="1156" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="FR" num="2" uknum="" type="ge" owner="LWG" issue="1156" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
General
Comment
@@ -6681,7 +6681,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>Also see UK156. Originally sent to the project editor, who rejected the part of the paper
in question as needing more work. </notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>NB did not sufficiently describe how to resolve their comment, and therefore we cannot make a change for the FCD. If a resolution were provided in the future, we would be happy to apply it.
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -6746,7 +6746,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="US" num="63" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1151" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="63" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1151" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
17-30
</section>
@@ -6768,7 +6768,7 @@
<notes>17 SG: should go to threads group; misclassified in document
<BR/><BR/>
     Concurrency SG: Create an issue. Hans will look into it.</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>Resolved by N3069
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -7513,7 +7513,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="150" uknum="199" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="150" uknum="199" type="Ed" owner="LWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
17.3
</section>
@@ -7542,9 +7542,8 @@
         definition of singular iterator to an iterator value with a
         singular state.
</suggestion>
-<notes>[Being reviewed by Editor]</notes>
-<rationale>
-</rationale>
+<notes></notes>
+<rationale>The requirements tables for move enabled operations have been tightened up without introducing this term (singular state).</rationale>
</comment>

<comment nb="UK" num="151" uknum="77" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -7854,7 +7853,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="165" uknum="92" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1156" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="165" uknum="92" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1156" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
17.5.3.2.2,
17.5.3.2.3
@@ -7872,7 +7871,7 @@
         described in N2235
</suggestion>
<notes>Robert Klarer to review</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>NB did not sufficiently describe how to resolve their comment, and therefore we cannot make a change for the FCD. If a resolution were provided in the future, we would be happy to apply it.
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -8019,7 +8018,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="172" uknum="99" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1264" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="172" uknum="99" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1264" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
17.6.2.4
</section>
@@ -8122,7 +8121,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="175" uknum="101" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1157" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="175" uknum="101" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1157" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
17.6.4.2.1
</section>
@@ -8554,7 +8553,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="DE" num="18" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1097,1098 " disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="18" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1097,1098 " disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
18.4
</section>
@@ -8614,7 +8613,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="187" uknum="266" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1144" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="187" uknum="266" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1144" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
18.4
</section>
@@ -8905,7 +8904,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="31" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1008" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="31" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1008" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
18.7.6
</section>
@@ -8921,7 +8920,7 @@
         a sample program which rethrows exception.
</suggestion>
<notes>Alisdair will incorporate this in the JP29 paper.</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>nested_exception is intended to be inherited from by exception classes that are to be thrown during the handling of another exception, i.e. when translating from one exception type to another. nested_exception allows the originally thrown exception to be easily retained in that scenario.
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -9669,7 +9668,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="38" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="817" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="38" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="817" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
20.6.12.1.3
</section>
@@ -9969,7 +9968,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="208" uknum="338" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="978" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="208" uknum="338" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="978" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
20.6.17
</section>
@@ -10108,7 +10107,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="US" num="72" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="817" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="72" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="817" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
20.7.12
</section>
@@ -10132,7 +10131,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="DE" num="21" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="817" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="21" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="817" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
20.7.12.1.3
</section>
@@ -10521,7 +10520,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="US" num="79" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="932" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="79" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="932" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
20.8.12.2.1
</section>
@@ -10552,7 +10551,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="44" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1030" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="44" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1030" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
20.8.13.6
</section>
@@ -11554,7 +11553,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="218" uknum="228" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1170" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="218" uknum="228" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1170" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
21.3.1
</section>
@@ -12145,7 +12144,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="222" uknum="295" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1034" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="222" uknum="295" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1034" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
23
</section>
@@ -13391,7 +13390,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="265" uknum="68" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1079" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="265" uknum="68" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1079" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
24.1.6
</section>
@@ -13640,7 +13639,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="270" uknum="17" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="940" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="270" uknum="17" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="940" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
24.3
</section>
@@ -13659,11 +13658,11 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>Howard will open an issue.
</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>Solved by N3066
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="271" uknum="145" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1011" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="271" uknum="145" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1011" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
24.3
</section>
@@ -13902,7 +13901,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="281" uknum="23" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1052" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="281" uknum="23" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1052" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
24.4.1.2.5
</section>
@@ -13922,7 +13921,7 @@
<notes>study group formed to come up with a suggested
resolution.
</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>There is no consensus for making this change.
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -14622,7 +14621,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="FR" num="35" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1154" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="FR" num="35" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1154" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
26.3
         [Complex
@@ -14639,7 +14638,7 @@
<suggestion></suggestion>
<notes>
</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>There is no consensus for making this change.
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -14794,7 +14793,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="65" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1094" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="65" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1094" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
27.4.4
</section>
@@ -14816,7 +14815,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="66" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1094" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="66" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1094" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
27.4.4.3
</section>
@@ -15476,7 +15475,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="314" uknum="343" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="Doc" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="314" uknum="343" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1263" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
28.4
</section>
@@ -15498,7 +15497,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>deferred to discussion of N2831.
</notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>We have in general reverted to the single swap signature taking lvalue references, which could be seen as the alternative solution to UK 314, bringing consistency to the standard.
</rationale>
</comment>

@@ -16045,7 +16044,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="76" uknum="" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1089" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="76" uknum="" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1089" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30
</section>
@@ -16233,7 +16232,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="322" uknum="168" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1158" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="322" uknum="168" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1158" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30.1.4
</section>
@@ -16257,7 +16256,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="323" uknum="171" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="929" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="323" uknum="171" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="929" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30.2.1
</section>
@@ -16287,7 +16286,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="324" uknum="169" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="889" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="324" uknum="169" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1182" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30.2.1.1
</section>
@@ -16308,7 +16307,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="JP" num="77" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1139" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="77" uknum="" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1139" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30.2.1.2
</section>
@@ -16451,7 +16450,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="327" uknum="179" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1159" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="327" uknum="179" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1159" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30.3.3.2.2
</section>
@@ -16488,7 +16487,7 @@
</rationale>
</comment>

-<comment nb="UK" num="328" uknum="182" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1159" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="UK" num="328" uknum="182" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1159" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
30.3.3.2.2
</section>

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk