Boost logo

Boost-Commit :

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r61147 - trunk/status
From: neil_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-04-08 16:00:14


Author: neilgroves
Date: 2010-04-08 16:00:13 EDT (Thu, 08 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 61147
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/61147

Log:
Boost.Range added exclusion of Borland compilers.
Added specific expected failure for msvc9.0 with stlport 5.2. This very specific configuration fails the push_front test.
Text files modified:
   trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml | 9 +++++++++
   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Modified: trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
==============================================================================
--- trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml (original)
+++ trunk/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml 2010-04-08 16:00:13 EDT (Thu, 08 Apr 2010)
@@ -4325,6 +4325,7 @@
     <!-- range -->
     <library name="range">
         <mark-unusable>
+ <toolset name="borland-*"/>
             <toolset name="mipspro"/>
             <toolset name="dmc-8_43-stlport-4_5_3"/>
             <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3*"/>
@@ -4363,6 +4364,14 @@
             </note>
         </mark-expected-failures>
         <mark-expected-failures>
+ <test name="push_front"/>
+ <toolset name="msvc-9.0~stlport5.2"/>
+ <note author="Neil Groves">
+ push_front fails the unit test in this configuration. I do not have this
+ configuration available to determine if a work-around is possible.
+ </note>
+ </mark-expected-failures>
+ <mark-expected-failures>
             <test name="reversible_range"/>
             <toolset name="hp_cxx-65*"/>
             <note author="Thorsten Ottosen">


Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk