Boost-Commit :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r66655 - sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-11-21 08:02:26

Next message: mario.mulansky_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r66656 - sandbox/odeint/branches/karsten/libs/numeric/odeint/ideas/generic_stepper"
Previous message: john_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r66654 - trunk/boost/config"

Author: bemandawes
Date: 2010-11-21 08:02:24 EST (Sun, 21 Nov 2010)
New Revision: 66655
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/66655

Log:
Initial post-Batavia update from Mike
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml | 343 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml 2010-11-21 08:02:24 EST (Sun, 21 Nov 2010)
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
<?xml version="1.0"?>

-<document date="2010-08-23"
- rev="0"
- docno="PL22.16 10/0108 = WG21 N3118"
+<document date="2010-11-20"
+ rev="4"
+ docno="PL22.16 10/xxxx = WG21 Nyyyy"
>

<comment nb="ITTF" num="1" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="2" type="ge" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="2" type="ge" owner="" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
1-30
</section>
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="1" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="1" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
1 through 15
</section>
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="1" type="ge/te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="1" type="ge/te" owner="" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
all
</section>
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="3" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="3" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3209.htm">
<section>
1 - 29
</section>
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="5" type="Ed" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="5" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
1.9
</section>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="6" type="Ed" owner="CWG" issue="1102" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="6" type="Ed" owner="CWG" issue="1102" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
1.9
</section>
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="2" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="2" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.9 and 1.10
</section>
@@ -483,9 +483,13 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>For concurrency group.</notes>
<rationale>
+Normatively, the behavior is well-defined by 1.9p8. If
+the atomic object is volatile, then all operations on it
+are observable, otherwise not. Note that “observable”
+means “observable outside of the program.”
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="7" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1173" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="7" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1173" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
1.9.6
</section>
@@ -554,7 +558,7 @@
is clear enough.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="23" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="23" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
<section>
1.10, 29
</section>
@@ -575,7 +579,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="14" type="ed" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="14" type="ed" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p4
</section>
@@ -621,9 +625,10 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>For concurrency group.</notes>
<rationale>
+The suggested update from US 168 was adopted.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="12" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="12" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1176" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
1.10p6
</section>
@@ -674,7 +679,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="9" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="9" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -693,7 +698,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="20" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="20" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p1
</section>
@@ -782,7 +787,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="19" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="19" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p5 1.10p13
</section>
@@ -853,7 +858,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="22" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="22" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p8
</section>
@@ -874,9 +879,15 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>For concurrency group.</notes>
<rationale>
+At the time that the memory model was formulated, there
+was considerable uncertainty as to what architectures
+respect control dependencies, and to what extent. It
+appears that this uncertainty is being cleared up, and
+our hope is that it will be ripe for standardization in
+a later TR.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="15" type="Ed" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="15" type="Ed" owner="CWG" issue="1177" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p9
</section>
@@ -888,7 +899,6 @@
The current draft has release/acquire synchronize-with
edges only between a release on one thread and an
acquire on a *different* thread, whereas the definition of
-We suggest changing the definition of
dependency-ordered-before permits the release and
consume to be on the same thread; it seems odd to permit
the latter. (At the moment function arguments can't race or
@@ -909,6 +919,7 @@
before X and X carries a dependency to B.
</description>
<suggestion>
+We suggest changing the definition of
dependency-ordered-before in 1.10p9 to the
following:<BR/>
An evaluation A is dependency-ordered
@@ -928,7 +939,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="11" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="11" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p12
</section>
@@ -981,7 +992,7 @@
a note.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="13" type="ed" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="13" type="ed" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p13
</section>
@@ -1044,7 +1055,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="18" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="18" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p13
</section>
@@ -1141,7 +1152,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="10" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="10" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1163,9 +1174,18 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>For concurrency group.</notes>
<rationale>
+The premise is incorrect; atomic objects may not
+overlap. The type argument to the atomic template
+must be a trivially-copyable type (29.5.3p1) and
+atomic objects are not trivially copyable. The atomic
+types provide no means to obtain a reference to
+internal members; all atomic operations are
+copy-in/copy-out. In short, any attempt to generate a
+pair of atomic variables whose memory overlaps results
+in undefined behavior.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="11" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="11" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1182,7 +1202,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="12" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="12" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1218,7 +1238,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="8" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="8" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1292,7 +1312,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="9" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="9" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1176" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1310,7 +1330,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="10" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="10" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1350,7 +1370,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="8" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="8" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10p10
</section>
@@ -1382,7 +1402,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="11" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="11" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1429,7 +1449,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="12" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="12" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1506,7 +1526,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="15" type="Te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="15" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
1.10
</section>
@@ -1520,6 +1540,12 @@
</suggestion>
<notes>For concurrency group.</notes>
<rationale>
+At the time that the memory model was formulated,
+there was considerable uncertainty as to what
+architectures respect control dependencies, and to
+what extent. It appears that this uncertainty is
+being cleared up, and our hope is that it will be
+ripe for standardization in a later TR.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="GB" num="16" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -1544,7 +1570,7 @@
the text as written is sufficient.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="13" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1103" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="13" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1103" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
2.2
</section>
@@ -1562,7 +1588,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="14" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1103" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="14" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1103" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
2.2 2.3 2.5 2.14.5
</section>
@@ -1724,7 +1750,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="15" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1104" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="15" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1104" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
2.6
</section>
@@ -1744,7 +1770,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="24" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1105" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="24" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1105" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3146.html">
<section>
2.11
</section>
@@ -1886,7 +1912,7 @@
The feature has been implemented.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="3" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1106" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="3" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1106" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
2.14.7
</section>
@@ -1921,7 +1947,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="17" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1107" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="17" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1107" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
2.14.8
</section>
@@ -2008,7 +2034,7 @@
(Reference should be to 2.14.8, not 2.24.8.)
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="19" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1109" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="19" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1109" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3214.html">
<section>
3
</section>
@@ -2159,7 +2185,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="24" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1112" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="24" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1112" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
3.5
</section>
@@ -2180,7 +2206,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="4" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1113" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="4" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1113" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
3.5
</section>
@@ -2256,7 +2282,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="18" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1114" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="18" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1114" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
3.8
</section>
@@ -2458,7 +2484,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="JP" num="1" type="TL" owner="CWG" issue="1117" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="1" type="TL" owner="CWG" issue="1117" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
5
</section>
@@ -2504,7 +2530,7 @@
in the standardization process.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="4" type="ed" owner="CWG" issue="1062" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="4" type="ed" owner="CWG" issue="1062" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
5.1.2
</section>
@@ -2799,7 +2825,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="32" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1119" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="32" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1119" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
5.2.5
</section>
@@ -2883,7 +2909,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="33" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1121" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="33" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1121" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
5.3.1
</section>
@@ -2906,7 +2932,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="24" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1122" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="24" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1122" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
5.3.3
</section>
@@ -2971,7 +2997,7 @@
The feature has been implemented.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="FI" num="17" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1123" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="FI" num="17" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1123" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3204.html">
<section>
5.3.7 [expr.unary.noexcept]
</section>
@@ -2992,7 +3018,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="JP" num="2" type="TL" owner="CWG" issue="1124" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="2" type="TL" owner="CWG" issue="1124" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
5.5
</section>
@@ -3009,6 +3035,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+There are no pointers to members of reference type (8.3.3p3).
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="US" num="36" type="ge" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -3090,7 +3117,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="25" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1126" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="25" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1126" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
5.19
</section>
@@ -3223,7 +3250,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="38" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="38" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
6.5 5
</section>
@@ -3367,7 +3394,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="39" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1128" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="39" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1128" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
7.1
</section>
@@ -3391,7 +3418,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="29" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1129" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="29" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1129" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
7.1.5
</section>
@@ -3421,7 +3448,7 @@
invocation of the function is a constant expression or not.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="40" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1130" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="40" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1130" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
7.1.6.2
</section>
@@ -3476,7 +3503,7 @@
future revision.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="41" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1131" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="41" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1131" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
7.1.6.3
</section>
@@ -3511,7 +3538,7 @@
and prevents possible future language enhancements.
</description>
<suggestion>
-Choose another keyword to indicate a latespecified
+Choose another keyword to indicate a late-specified
return type. The identifiers lateret and
postret have no Google code search hits. The
identifiers late, latetype, and posttype have 30-40
@@ -3601,7 +3628,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="31" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1115" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="31" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1115" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3190.html">
<section>
7.6.2
</section>
@@ -3647,7 +3674,7 @@
There was no consensus to make the suggested change.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="44" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1133" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="44" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1133" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3206.html">
<section>
7.6.5
</section>
@@ -3744,7 +3771,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="8" type="ed" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="8" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
8.1
</section>
@@ -3822,7 +3849,7 @@
storage class specifiers was incorrect and has been removed.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="47" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1134" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="47" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1134" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
8.4.2
</section>
@@ -4038,7 +4065,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="48" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1138" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="48" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1138" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
8.5.3
</section>
@@ -4069,7 +4096,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="49" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1139" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="49" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1139" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
8.5.3
</section>
@@ -4096,7 +4123,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="37" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1138" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="37" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1138" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
8.5.3
</section>
@@ -4189,7 +4216,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="10" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1138" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="10" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1138" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
8.5.3
</section>
@@ -4307,7 +4334,7 @@
C++/CLI has a very similar feature that has been implemented.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="52" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1142" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="52" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1142" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
9.3
</section>
@@ -4560,7 +4587,7 @@
covariant return values when only the class definition is available.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="56" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1144" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="56" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1144" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
11.3 [class.access.decl]
</section>
@@ -4665,7 +4692,7 @@
The feature has been implemented.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="39" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1146" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="39" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1146" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
12.4
</section>
@@ -4688,7 +4715,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="40" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1147" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="40" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1147" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3204.html">
<section>
12.4
</section>
@@ -4704,7 +4731,7 @@
noexcept. This becomes important evaluating the
noexcept operator, where any of the unevaluated subexpressions
may produce a temporary object. As this is
-expected to be the overwhelmingly common case, a userdeclared
+expected to be the overwhelmingly common case, a user-declared
destructor that does not supply an exception
specification should be considered as if declared
noexcept(true) rather than noexcept(false), the default for
@@ -4721,7 +4748,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="9" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1147" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="9" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1147" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
12.4 and 15.4
</section>
@@ -4796,7 +4823,7 @@
The feature has been implemented.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="11" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1148" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="11" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1148" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
12.8
</section>
@@ -4850,7 +4877,7 @@
the standardization process.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="41" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1146" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="41" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1146" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
12.8
</section>
@@ -4890,7 +4917,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="62" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1051" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="62" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1051" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
12.8
</section>
@@ -4909,7 +4936,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="63" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1064" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="63" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1064" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
12.8
</section>
@@ -4931,7 +4958,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="64" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1066" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="64" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1066" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
12.8
</section>
@@ -5028,7 +5055,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="67" type="ge" owner="CWG" issue="1152" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="67" type="ge" owner="CWG" issue="1152" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
13.3.2
</section>
@@ -5163,7 +5190,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="68" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1153" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="68" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1153" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
13.4
</section>
@@ -5219,7 +5246,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="69" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1154" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="69" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1154" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.3.2
</section>
@@ -5239,7 +5266,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="12" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1155" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="12" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1155" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.3.2
</section>
@@ -5369,7 +5396,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="70" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1156" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="70" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1156" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.5.6.2
</section>
@@ -5395,7 +5422,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="71" type="unused" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="71" type="unused" owner="" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
unused
</section>
@@ -5509,7 +5536,7 @@
The feature has been implemented.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="73" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1158" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="73" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1158" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.5.7
</section>
@@ -5542,7 +5569,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="74" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1159" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="74" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1159" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.5.7
</section>
@@ -5655,7 +5682,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="43" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1160" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="43" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1160" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.6.2.1p3
</section>
@@ -5701,7 +5728,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="44" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1161" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="44" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1161" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.6p5
</section>
@@ -5944,7 +5971,7 @@
instantiation for inlining is allowed.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="77" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1164" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="77" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1164" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
14.8.2.1
</section>
@@ -5971,7 +5998,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="78" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1165" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="78" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1165" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
15.2
</section>
@@ -6132,7 +6159,7 @@
Committee on this point.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="47" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1168" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="47" type="Te" owner="CWG" issue="1168" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
15.5.1
</section>
@@ -6318,7 +6345,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="13" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1169" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="13" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1169" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
16.8
</section>
@@ -6353,7 +6380,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="60" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1344" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="60" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1344" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
17-30
</section>
@@ -6370,6 +6397,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+See documents N3148, N3150, N3195, N3155, N3156, N3199, and N3180.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="GB" num="61" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1345" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -6549,7 +6577,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1351" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1351" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
Library clauses
</section>
@@ -6564,6 +6592,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+See documents N3148, N3150, N3195, N3155, N3156, N3199, and N3180.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="CH" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1352" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -6628,7 +6657,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="52" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1354" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="52" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1354" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
17.3.7
</section>
@@ -6644,7 +6673,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="50" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1355" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="50" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1355" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
17.3.13
</section>
@@ -6663,7 +6692,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="51" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1356" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="51" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1356" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
17.3.14
</section>
@@ -6716,7 +6745,7 @@
This is pseudo-code; okay as written.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="53" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1357" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="53" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1357" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3110.htm">
<section>
17.5.2.1.3
</section>
@@ -6924,7 +6953,7 @@
Removed the offending word.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="82" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1362" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="82" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1362" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
17.6.3.9
</section>
@@ -7099,7 +7128,7 @@
<rationale>There was consensus that it is too late to make such a change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="71" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1365" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="71" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1365" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3189.html">
<section>
18.6.2.4 / 18.8.2.2 / 18.8.3.2
</section>
@@ -7120,7 +7149,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="14" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1366" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="14" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1366" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3189.html">
<section>
18.6.1.4
</section>
@@ -7163,7 +7192,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="73" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1368" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="73" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1368" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
18.8.4
</section>
@@ -7212,7 +7241,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="84" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1370" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="84" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1370" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
18.8.6 [except.nested]
</section>
@@ -7648,7 +7677,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="90" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1377" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="90" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1377" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3143.html">
<section>
20.3
</section>
@@ -7762,7 +7791,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="91" type="E" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="91" type="E" owner="LWG" issue="1377" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
<section>
Merged with US 90
</section>
@@ -7838,7 +7867,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="15" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1378" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="15" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1378" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
<section>
20.3.5.2, 20.4.2.1
</section>
@@ -7909,7 +7938,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="95" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1379" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="95" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1379" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
<section>
20.3.5.2
</section>
@@ -7940,7 +7969,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1380" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1380" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
<section>
20.3.5.2, 20.4.2.1
</section>
@@ -8005,7 +8034,7 @@
<rationale>No consensus to make this change.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="96" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1382" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="96" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1382" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
<section>
20.3.5.2 20.4.2.1 20.4.2.2
</section>
@@ -8026,7 +8055,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="97" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1383" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="97" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1383" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
<section>
20.3.5.2 and 20.4.2
</section>
@@ -8240,7 +8269,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="89" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1389" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="89" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1389" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3210.pdf">
<section>
20.6.2
</section>
@@ -8373,7 +8402,7 @@
built-in types. They do not belong in Clause 18.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1390" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1390" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
20.7
</section>
@@ -8389,7 +8418,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1391" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1391" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
20.7
</section>
@@ -8418,7 +8447,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="102" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1392" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="102" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1392" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3123.html">
<section>
20.7.4
</section>
@@ -8437,7 +8466,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="91" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="91" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
20.7.4.3
</section>
@@ -8464,7 +8493,7 @@
the proposed change would be clearer.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="92" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1393" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="92" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1393" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
20.7.4.3
</section>
@@ -8486,7 +8515,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="FI" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-08-07" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="FI" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-132010-08-07" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
<section>
20.7.4.3, Table 45 (Type property predicates)
</section>
@@ -8659,7 +8688,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="95" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1397" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="95" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1397" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3198.html">
<section>
20.8
</section>
@@ -9003,7 +9032,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="106" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1404" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="106" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1404" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
20.9.3
</section>
@@ -9631,7 +9660,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="109" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1414" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="109" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1414" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
21.2.3.2/3/4
</section>
@@ -9875,7 +9904,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="115" type="te" owner="editor" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="115" type="te" owner="editor" issue="" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3173.pdf">
<section>
23.2.1
</section>
@@ -10678,7 +10707,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="121" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1432" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="121" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1432" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
25.3.12 [alg.random.shuffle]
</section>
@@ -10698,7 +10727,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="119" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1433" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="119" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1433" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
25.3.12
</section>
@@ -10824,7 +10853,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="120" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1435" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="120" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1435" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
26.4.7
</section>
@@ -10877,7 +10906,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="121" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1436" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="121" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1436" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
26.5.3
</section>
@@ -10904,7 +10933,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="124" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1437" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="124" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1437" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
26.5.3.2
</section>
@@ -11103,7 +11132,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="134" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1439" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="134" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1439" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
26.5.8.5.2 [rand.dist.samp.pconst], 26.5.8.5.3 [rand.dist.samp.plinear]
</section>
@@ -11132,7 +11161,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="135" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1440" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="135" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1440" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
26.5.8.5.3
</section>
@@ -11243,7 +11272,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="9" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1442" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="9" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1442" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
27.2.3p2 30.3.1.2p6 30.3.1.5p7 30.6.4p7 30.6.9p5 30.6.10.1p23
</section>
@@ -11300,7 +11329,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="123" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1414, 1444" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="123" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1414, 1444" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
27.5.3.2
</section>
@@ -11320,7 +11349,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="137" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1445" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="137" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1445" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3168.htm">
<section>
27.7
</section>
@@ -11365,7 +11394,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="139" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1447" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="139" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1447" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3168.htm">
<section>
27.7
</section>
@@ -11473,7 +11502,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="4" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1449" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="4" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1449" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
27.8.2
</section>
@@ -11646,7 +11675,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1453" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1453" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3158.html">
<section>
28.10.3
</section>
@@ -12360,7 +12389,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="132" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1462" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="132" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1462" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
<section>
29.5.1
</section>
@@ -12481,7 +12510,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="161" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1465" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="161" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1465" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
<section>
[atomic.types.address] 29.5.2
</section>
@@ -12524,7 +12553,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="163" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1467" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="163" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1467" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
<section>
[atomics.type.address], [atomics.types.generic] 29.5.2, 29.5.3
</section>
@@ -12548,7 +12577,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="164" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1468" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="164" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1468" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
<section>
[atomics.types.address] 29.5.2
</section>
@@ -12600,7 +12629,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="133" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1469" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="133" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1469" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
<section>
29.5.3
</section>
@@ -12738,7 +12767,7 @@
Seems to be a duplicate of US 166 but with the wrong section number.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="168" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1471" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="168" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1471" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
29.6
</section>
@@ -12821,7 +12850,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="171" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1472" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="171" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1472" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3196.html">
<section>
29.6
</section>
@@ -13116,7 +13145,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="138" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1481" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="138" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1481" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
<section>
30.2
</section>
@@ -13133,7 +13162,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="181" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1482" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="181" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1482" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
<section>
30.2.4
</section>
@@ -13342,7 +13371,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="26" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1489" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="26" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1489" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
<section>
30.4
</section>
@@ -13370,7 +13399,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="27" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1490" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="27" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1490" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
<section>
30.4.1
</section>
@@ -13414,7 +13443,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="186" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1491" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="186" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1491" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3209.htm">
<section>
30.4.1
</section>
@@ -13478,7 +13507,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="188" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1492" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="188" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1492" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
<section>
30.4.1
</section>
@@ -13705,7 +13734,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="191" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1495" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="191" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1495" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
<section>
30.5
</section>
@@ -13758,7 +13787,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="28" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1496" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="28" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1496" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
<section>
30.5.1
</section>
@@ -13904,7 +13933,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="29" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1498" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="29" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1498" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
<section>
30.5.1 and 30.5.2
</section>
@@ -14094,7 +14123,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="194" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1501" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="194" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1501" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3192.html">
<section>
30.6
</section>
@@ -14280,7 +14309,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="201" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1508" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="201" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1508" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
<section>
[futures.unique_future], [futures.shared_future], [futures.atomic_future], [futures.task] 30.6.6 30.6.7 30.6.8 30.6.10
</section>
@@ -14303,7 +14332,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="202" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1509" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="202" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1509" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
<section>
[futures.atomic_future] 30.6.8
</section>
@@ -14326,7 +14355,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="203" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1510" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="203" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1510" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
<section>
[futures.atomic_future] 30.6.8
</section>
@@ -14346,7 +14375,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="204" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1511" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="204" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1511" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
<section>
30.6.8
</section>
@@ -14371,7 +14400,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="205" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1512" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="205" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1512" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
<section>
[futures.async] 30.6.9
</section>
@@ -14396,7 +14425,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="36" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1513" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="36" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1513" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3188.html">
<section>
30.6.9 and 30.6.1
</section>
@@ -14596,7 +14625,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="FI" num="6" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1012" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="FI" num="6" type="te" owner="CWG" issue="1012" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
D.2 [depr.static]
</section>
@@ -14615,7 +14644,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="142" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1516" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="142" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1516" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
<section>
D10
</section>

Next message: mario.mulansky_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r66656 - sandbox/odeint/branches/karsten/libs/numeric/odeint/ideas/generic_stepper"
Previous message: john_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-commit] svn:boost r66654 - trunk/boost/config"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk