Boost logo

Boost-Commit :

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r66658 - sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-11-21 13:05:11


Author: bemandawes
Date: 2010-11-21 13:05:09 EST (Sun, 21 Nov 2010)
New Revision: 66658
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/66658

Log:
LWG work-in-progress
Text files modified:
   sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
   1 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml 2010-11-21 13:05:09 EST (Sun, 21 Nov 2010)
@@ -6366,7 +6366,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="80" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1347" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="80" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1347" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3155.html">
 <section>
 [library] 17 - 30
 </section>
@@ -6380,7 +6380,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="60" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1344" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="60" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1344" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3148.html">
 <section>
 17-30
 </section>
@@ -6430,7 +6430,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="62" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1346" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="62" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1346" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3195.html">
 <section>
 17-30
 </section>
@@ -6457,7 +6457,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="63" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1347" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="63" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1347" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3155.html">
 <section>
 17-30
 </section>
@@ -6577,7 +6577,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1351" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1351" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3148.html">
 <section>
 Library clauses
 </section>
@@ -6595,7 +6595,7 @@
 See documents N3148, N3150, N3195, N3155, N3156, N3199, and N3180.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1352" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1352" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3195.html">
 <section>
 Library clauses
 </section>
@@ -6673,7 +6673,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="50" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1355" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
+<comment nb="GB" num="50" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1355" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
 <section>
 17.3.13
 </section>
@@ -6692,7 +6692,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="51" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1356" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
+<comment nb="GB" num="51" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1356" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
 <section>
 17.3.14
 </section>
@@ -6745,7 +6745,7 @@
 This is pseudo-code; okay as written.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="53" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1357" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3110.htm">
+<comment nb="GB" num="53" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1357" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3110.htm">
 <section>
 17.5.2.1.3
 </section>
@@ -6808,7 +6808,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="56" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1359" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="56" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1359" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 17.6.1.3
 </section>
@@ -6834,7 +6834,7 @@
 required for a free-standing implementation.
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>No consensus for a change at this time.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="GB" num="57" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1360" disp="accepted" date="2010-08-07" extdoc="">
@@ -6861,7 +6861,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="58" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1361" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="58" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1361" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 17.6.2
 </section>
@@ -6889,7 +6889,7 @@
 use this name.
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The standard is correct as written.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="GB" num="59" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="modified" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -7128,7 +7128,7 @@
 <rationale>There was consensus that it is too late to make such a change at this time.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="71" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1365" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3189.html">
+<comment nb="GB" num="71" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1365" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3189.html">
 <section>
 18.6.2.4 / 18.8.2.2 / 18.8.3.2
 </section>
@@ -7149,7 +7149,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="14" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1366" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3189.html">
+<comment nb="DE" num="14" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1366" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3189.html">
 <section>
 18.6.1.4
 </section>
@@ -7391,7 +7391,7 @@
 <rationale>This is already addressed by 17.5.2.2 [functions.within.classes]/1.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="79" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1373" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="79" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1373" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 20, 22, 24, 28
 </section>
@@ -7417,7 +7417,7 @@
 regex_traits
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>This suggest is not a defect, as the likely benefit is small, if any, compared to the cost of not just implementating the feature, but also explaining/teaching it.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="US" num="85" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1374" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -7593,7 +7593,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="88" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1376" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="88" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1376" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 20.2.5
 </section>
@@ -7605,7 +7605,7 @@
 See Appendix 1 - Additional Details
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>Withdrawn by the submitter.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="US" num="89" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -7677,7 +7677,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="90" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1377" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3143.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="90" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1377" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3143.html">
 <section>
 20.3
 </section>
@@ -7867,7 +7867,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="15" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1378" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
+<comment nb="DE" num="15" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1378" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
 <section>
 20.3.5.2, 20.4.2.1
 </section>
@@ -7938,7 +7938,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="95" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1379" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="95" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1379" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
 <section>
 20.3.5.2
 </section>
@@ -7969,7 +7969,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1380" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
+<comment nb="DE" num="16" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1380" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
 <section>
 20.3.5.2, 20.4.2.1
 </section>
@@ -8034,7 +8034,7 @@
 <rationale>No consensus to make this change.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="96" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1382" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="96" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1382" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
 <section>
 20.3.5.2 20.4.2.1 20.4.2.2
 </section>
@@ -8055,7 +8055,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="97" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1383" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="97" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1383" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3140.html">
 <section>
 20.3.5.2 and 20.4.2
 </section>
@@ -8269,7 +8269,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="89" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1389" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3210.pdf">
+<comment nb="GB" num="89" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1389" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3210.pdf">
 <section>
 20.6.2
 </section>
@@ -8402,7 +8402,7 @@
 built-in types. They do not belong in Clause 18.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1390" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
+<comment nb="DE" num="17" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1390" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
 <section>
 20.7
 </section>
@@ -8418,7 +8418,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1391" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
+<comment nb="DE" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1391" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
 <section>
 20.7
 </section>
@@ -8447,7 +8447,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="102" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1392" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3123.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="102" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1392" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3123.html">
 <section>
 20.7.4
 </section>
@@ -8493,7 +8493,7 @@
 the proposed change would be clearer.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="92" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1393" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
+<comment nb="GB" num="92" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1393" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3142.htm">
 <section>
 20.7.4.3
 </section>
@@ -8585,7 +8585,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="JP" num="32" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1395" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="32" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1395" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 20.7.5
 </section>
@@ -8688,7 +8688,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="95" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1397" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3198.html">
+<comment nb="GB" num="95" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1397" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3198.html">
 <section>
 20.8
 </section>
@@ -8721,7 +8721,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="96" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1398" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="96" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1398" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 20.8
 </section>
@@ -8745,7 +8745,7 @@
 'less'.
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>No consensus to make a change.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="GB" num="97" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="" disp="rejected" date="2010-08-07" extdoc="">
@@ -9273,7 +9273,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="JP" num="5" type="tl" owner="LWG" issue="1406" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="JP" num="5" type="tl" owner="LWG" issue="1406" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 20.9.11.2
 </section>
@@ -9499,7 +9499,7 @@
 <rationale>No consensus to make a change.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="111" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1409" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="111" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1409" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
 <section>
 20.10.5.2
 </section>
@@ -9518,7 +9518,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="107" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1410" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="107" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1410" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
 <section>
 20.10.5.2
 </section>
@@ -9551,7 +9551,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="20" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1411" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="20" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1411" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
 <section>
 20.10.5.2
 </section>
@@ -9573,7 +9573,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="21" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1412" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="21" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1412" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
 <section>
 20.10.5.2
 </section>
@@ -10292,7 +10292,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="118" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1422" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="118" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1422" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 23.3.7
 </section>
@@ -10314,7 +10314,7 @@
 having the wrong reference type.
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The LWG does not wish to address this problem at this time. The preference is to deal with it with the more general proxy iterator problem.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="JP" num="6" type="tl" owner="LWG" issue="1423" disp="accepted" date="2010-08-07" extdoc="">
@@ -11349,7 +11349,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="137" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1445" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3168.htm">
+<comment nb="US" num="137" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1445" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3168.htm">
 <section>
 27.7
 </section>
@@ -11365,7 +11365,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="138" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1446" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="138" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1446" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3179.html">
 <section>
 27.7
 </section>
@@ -11391,10 +11391,10 @@
 See Appendix 1 - Additional Details
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The Library Working Group reviewed n3179 and concluded that this change alone was not sufficient, as it would require changes to some of the derived stream types in the library. The preference is not make such a broad fix, and retain the current semnatic. This is closed as NAD rather than NAD future as it will be difficult to rename the new functions introduced in the C++0x revision of the standard at a later date.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="139" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1447" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3168.htm">
+<comment nb="US" num="139" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1447" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3168.htm">
 <section>
 27.7
 </section>
@@ -11675,7 +11675,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1453" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3158.html">
+<comment nb="GB" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1453" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3158.html">
 <section>
 28.10.3
 </section>
@@ -11792,7 +11792,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="128" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1455, 1454" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="128" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1455, 1454" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 29
 </section>
@@ -11817,7 +11817,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="22" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1455, 1454" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="22" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1455, 1454" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 29
 </section>
@@ -12389,7 +12389,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="132" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1462" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
+<comment nb="GB" num="132" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1462" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 29.5.1
 </section>
@@ -12420,7 +12420,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="157" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1463" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="157" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1463" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 [atomics.types.integral] 29.5.1
 </section>
@@ -12488,7 +12488,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="160" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1464" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="160" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1464" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 [atomic.types.integral] 29.5.1
 </section>
@@ -12510,7 +12510,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="161" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1465" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="161" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1465" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 [atomic.types.address] 29.5.2
 </section>
@@ -12532,7 +12532,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="162" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1466" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="162" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1466" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 [atomics.typres.address] 29.5.2
 </section>
@@ -12553,7 +12553,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="163" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1467" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="163" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1467" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 [atomics.type.address], [atomics.types.generic] 29.5.2, 29.5.3
 </section>
@@ -12577,7 +12577,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="164" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1468" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="164" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1468" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 [atomics.types.address] 29.5.2
 </section>
@@ -12629,7 +12629,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="133" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1469" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
+<comment nb="GB" num="133" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1469" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3193.html">
 <section>
 29.5.3
 </section>
@@ -12874,7 +12874,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="172" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1473" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="172" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1473" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 29.6
 </section>
@@ -12894,7 +12894,7 @@
 memory_order_seq_cst."
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The Concurrency subgroup reviewed this, and deemed it NAD according to 29.6 [atomics.types.operations] paragraph 2, bullet 4.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="US" num="173" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -13145,7 +13145,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="138" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1481" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
+<comment nb="GB" num="138" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1481" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
 <section>
 30.2
 </section>
@@ -13162,7 +13162,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="181" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1482" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="181" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1482" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3191.html">
 <section>
 30.2.4
 </section>
@@ -13228,7 +13228,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="183" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1484" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="183" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1484" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 30.3.1
 </section>
@@ -13242,7 +13242,7 @@
 pthread_join doesn't have a timeout version.
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The concurrency working group deemed this an extension beyond the scope of C++0x.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="US" num="184" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1485" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -13350,7 +13350,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="185" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1488" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="185" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1488" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 30.4
 </section>
@@ -13368,7 +13368,7 @@
 development of more compatible APIs.
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The concurrency group reviewed the options, and decided that closer harmony should wait until both standards are published.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="CH" num="26" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1489" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
@@ -13399,7 +13399,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="27" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1490" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
+<comment nb="CH" num="27" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1490" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
 <section>
 30.4.1
 </section>
@@ -13443,7 +13443,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="186" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1491" disp="accepted" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3209.htm">
+<comment nb="US" num="186" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1491" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3209.htm">
 <section>
 30.4.1
 </section>
@@ -13507,7 +13507,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="188" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1492" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="188" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1492" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3197.html">
 <section>
 30.4.1
 </section>
@@ -13549,7 +13549,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="189" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1493" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="189" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1493" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 30.4.1.1 30.4.1.2
 </section>
@@ -13572,7 +13572,7 @@
 avoid a memory fence).
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The Concurrency subgroup reviewed this issue and deemed it to be an extension to be handled after publishing C++0x.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="JP" num="59" type="E" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -13956,7 +13956,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="193" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1499" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="193" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1499" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
 <section>
 30.5.1, 30.5.2
 </section>
@@ -13969,7 +13969,7 @@
 optimization. See Appendix 1 - Additional Details
 </suggestion>
 <notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>THe Concurrency subgroup reviewed the issue, and deemed it an extension to be handled after C++0x.
 </rationale>
 </comment>
 <comment nb="JP" num="62" type="E" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -14123,7 +14123,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="194" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1501" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3192.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="194" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1501" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3192.html">
 <section>
 30.6
 </section>
@@ -14309,7 +14309,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="201" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1508" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
+<comment nb="US" num="201" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1508" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3194.html">
 <section>
 [futures.unique_future], [futures.shared_future], [futures.atomic_future], [futures.task] 30.6.6 30.6.7 30.6.8 30.6.10
 </section>
@@ -14425,7 +14425,7 @@
 <rationale>
 </rationale>
 </comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="36" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1513" disp="" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3188.html">
+<comment nb="CH" num="36" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1513" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/N3188.html">
 <section>
 30.6.9 and 30.6.1
 </section>


Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk