Boost-Commit :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r70670 - sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2011-03-28 15:17:38

Author: bemandawes
Date: 2011-03-28 15:17:38 EDT (Mon, 28 Mar 2011)
New Revision: 70670
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/70670

Log:
Apply Madrid LWG and Concurrency formal motions and LWG and Concurrency NAD actions. All LWG owed issues now have dispositions.
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/FCD/comments.xml 2011-03-28 15:17:38 EDT (Mon, 28 Mar 2011)
@@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="34" type="te" owner="" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="34" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1524" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
5.3.4, 5.3.5
</section>
@@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@
See documents N3148, N3150, N3195, N3155, N3156, N3199, and N3180.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="61" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1345" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="61" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1345" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3279.pdf">
<section>
17-30
</section>
@@ -6480,7 +6480,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="64" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1348" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="64" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1348" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
17-30
</section>
@@ -6509,9 +6509,10 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+Standard is correct as written.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="65" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1349" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="65" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1349" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
17-30
</section>
@@ -6561,7 +6562,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="15" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1421, 1350" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="15" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1421, 1350" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3266.pdf">
<section>
Library clauses
</section>
@@ -6612,7 +6613,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1353" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="18" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1353" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3264.html">
<section>
17
</section>
@@ -6785,7 +6786,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="55" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1358" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="55" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1358" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
17.6.1.3
</section>
@@ -6806,6 +6808,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+We are not adding new headers to freestanding at this point.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="GB" num="56" type="Ge" owner="LWG" issue="1359" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
@@ -7091,7 +7094,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="19" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1364" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="19" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1364" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
18.8.5
</section>
@@ -7213,7 +7216,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="74" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1369" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="74" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1369" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
18.8.5
</section>
@@ -7239,6 +7243,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+There is no concensus for a change.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="US" num="84" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1370" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
@@ -7264,7 +7269,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="75" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1371" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="75" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1371" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
19
</section>
@@ -7291,6 +7297,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+The standard is correct as written. See 18.8.1 [exception], p2
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="GB" num="76" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1372" disp="accepted" date="2010-08-07" extdoc="">
@@ -7420,7 +7427,7 @@
<rationale>This suggest is not a defect, as the likely benefit is small, if any, compared to the cost of not just implementating the feature, but also explaining/teaching it.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="85" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1374" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="85" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1374" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3264.html">
<section>
20.2.1
</section>
@@ -7566,7 +7573,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="87" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1375" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="87" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1375" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
20.2.5
</section>
@@ -7591,6 +7599,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+No concensus to make a change
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="US" num="88" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1376" disp="rejected" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="">
@@ -8177,7 +8186,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="88" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1385" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="88" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1385" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
20.4.2.4
</section>
@@ -8653,7 +8662,8 @@
<rationale>Standard is correct as written.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="104" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1396" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="104" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1396" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
28.8
</section>
@@ -8668,7 +8678,7 @@
Add allocators to regexes
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>No consensus for a change at this time
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="GB" num="94" type="Ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -8942,7 +8952,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="99" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1401" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="99" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1401" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
20.9
</section>
@@ -9436,7 +9446,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="103" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1408" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="103" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1408" disp="accepted" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
20.9.12
</section>
@@ -9593,7 +9603,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="112" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1413" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="112" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1413" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
20.10.5.3
</section>
@@ -9610,6 +9621,12 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+The standard is correct as written. This is not a defect. Threre are a number of places
+in the standard where we allow implentations to choose their preferred technique,
+the most obvious example being the iterator/const_iterator types of set.
+
+Typically, this means it is not portable to declare function overloads that differ
+only in their use of these types.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="JP" num="39" type="E" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -9731,7 +9748,7 @@
<rationale>No consensus to make this change.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="111" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1526" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="111" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1526" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
21.5
</section>
@@ -10103,7 +10120,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="113" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1418" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="113" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1418" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
23.3.2.2
</section>
@@ -10183,7 +10200,7 @@
now been removed.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="115" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1420" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="115" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1420" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
23.3.4.2
</section>
@@ -10228,7 +10245,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="DE" num="22" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1421" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="DE" num="22" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1421" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
23.3.5.1, 23.3.5.2, 23.3.5.3
</section>
@@ -10271,7 +10289,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="117" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1525" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="117" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1525" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
23.3.6.2
</section>
@@ -10972,7 +10990,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1438" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1438" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
26.5.4.1 [rand.adapt.disc], 26.5.4.2 [rand.adapt.ibits], 26.5.4.3 [rand.adapt.shuf]
</section>
@@ -11313,7 +11331,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="122" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1442, 1443" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="122" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1442, 1443" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
27, 30
</section>
@@ -11439,7 +11458,7 @@
<rationale>No consensus for a change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="124" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1448" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="124" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1448" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
27.8.1.3
</section>
@@ -11559,7 +11578,8 @@
<rationale>No consensus to make a change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="127" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1450" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="127" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1450" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
28.5.2
</section>
@@ -11587,6 +11607,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+There is no concensus for change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="JP" num="50" type="E" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -11639,7 +11660,8 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="141" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1451" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="141" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1451" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
28.8
</section>
@@ -11655,9 +11677,11 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+There is no consensus for a change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="125" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1452" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="125" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1452" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25"
+ extdoc="">
<section>
28.10.3
</section>
@@ -11673,6 +11697,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+The standard is correct as written.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="GB" num="126" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1453" disp="modified" date="2010-11-13" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3158.html">
@@ -11836,7 +11861,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="129" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1456" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="129" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1456" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29
</section>
@@ -11891,6 +11916,7 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+There is no concensus for a change to the standard.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="US" num="142" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -11986,7 +12012,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="130" type="Ed" owner="LWG" issue="1457" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="130" type="Ed" owner="LWG" issue="1457" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
29.2
</section>
@@ -12159,7 +12185,7 @@
It's named in the second and fourth bullet items.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="131" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1458" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="131" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1458" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.3
</section>
@@ -12176,9 +12202,10 @@
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
<rationale>
+There is no concensus for a change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="21" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1459" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="21" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1459" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
9.3p8 1.9p13
</section>
@@ -12234,7 +12261,7 @@
Please clarify.
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>There is no concensus for a change at this time.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="US" num="153" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="rejected" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -12261,7 +12288,7 @@
technical change.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="154" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1460" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="154" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1460" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
[atomics.lockfree] 29.4
</section>
@@ -12297,7 +12324,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CA" num="1" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1461" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CA" num="1" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1461" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.4, 29.6 29.7
</section>
@@ -12338,7 +12365,7 @@
#define ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT see below
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>There is no concensus for a change.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="US" num="156" type="ed" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -12713,7 +12740,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="165" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1470" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="165" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1470" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.5.3
</section>
@@ -12935,7 +12962,7 @@
from the Effects clause. Okay as written.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="175" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1474" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="175" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1474" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.6
</section>
@@ -12957,7 +12984,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="23" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1475" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="23" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1475" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.6
</section>
@@ -12997,7 +13024,7 @@
Okay as written. Two different subjects, two paragraphs.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="177" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1476" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="177" type="ed" owner="LWG" issue="1476" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
[atomics.types.operations] 29.6
</section>
@@ -13014,7 +13041,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="135" type="Ed" owner="LWG" issue="1477" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="135" type="Ed" owner="LWG" issue="1477" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.6
</section>
@@ -13041,7 +13068,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="136" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1478" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="136" type="Te" owner="LWG" issue="1478" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.6
</section>
@@ -13080,7 +13107,7 @@
Changed "nor" to "or".
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="179" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1479" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="179" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1479" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.8
</section>
@@ -13099,7 +13126,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="GB" num="137" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1480" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="GB" num="137" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1480" disp="accepted" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
29.8
</section>
@@ -13245,7 +13272,7 @@
<rationale>The concurrency working group deemed this an extension beyond the scope of C++0x.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="184" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1485" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="184" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1485" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.3.1.1
</section>
@@ -13265,7 +13292,7 @@
associated std::thread object.
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>There is no concensus for a change.
</rationale>
</comment>
<comment nb="JP" num="97" type="E" owner="editor" issue="" disp="accepted" date="" extdoc="">
@@ -13310,7 +13337,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="24" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1486" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="24" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1486" disp="rejected" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.3.2
</section>
@@ -13326,10 +13353,10 @@
the same value even after detaching.
</suggestion>
<notes></notes>
-<rationale>
+<rationale>The standard is correct as written. See 30.3.2 [thread.thread.this]/1.
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="25" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1487" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="25" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1487" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.3.2
</section>
@@ -13693,7 +13720,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="190" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1494" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="190" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1494" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.4.5.2
</section>
@@ -13829,7 +13856,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="30" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1497" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="30" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1497" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.5.1 and 30.5.2
</section>
@@ -14166,7 +14193,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="195" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1502" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="195" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1502" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
30.6.4
</section>
@@ -14182,7 +14209,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="CH" num="35" type="ed/te" owner="LWG" issue="1503" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="CH" num="35" type="ed/te" owner="LWG" issue="1503" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.6.4ff
</section>
@@ -14204,7 +14231,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="196" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1504" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="196" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1504" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.6.5
</section>
@@ -14222,7 +14249,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="197" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1505" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="197" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1505, 1507" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
30.6.5
</section>
@@ -14266,7 +14293,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="199" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1507" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="199" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1507" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
[futures.promise] 30.6.5
</section>
@@ -14540,7 +14567,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="207" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1514" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="207" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1514" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="">
<section>
[futures.task.members] 30.6.10.1
</section>
@@ -14562,7 +14589,7 @@
<rationale>
</rationale>
</comment>
-<comment nb="US" num="208" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1515" disp="" date="" extdoc="">
+<comment nb="US" num="208" type="te" owner="LWG" issue="1515" disp="modified" date="2011-03-25" extdoc="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3278.html">
<section>
[futures.task.members] 30.6.10.1
</section>

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk