[Boost-commit] svn:boost r85194 - trunk/libs/thread/doc

Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r85194 - trunk/libs/thread/doc
From: vicente.botet_at_[hidden]
Date: 2013-08-03 03:44:15

Author: viboes
Date: 2013-08-03 03:44:15 EDT (Sat, 03 Aug 2013)
New Revision: 85194
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/85194

Log:
Thread: apply pathc for #8931.

Text files modified: 
   trunk/libs/thread/doc/external_locking.qbk |     4 ++--                                    
   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Modified: trunk/libs/thread/doc/external_locking.qbk
==============================================================================
--- trunk/libs/thread/doc/external_locking.qbk	Sat Aug  3 02:09:35 2013	(r85193)
+++ trunk/libs/thread/doc/external_locking.qbk	2013-08-03 03:44:15 EDT (Sat, 03 Aug 2013)	(r85194)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
 * You can create a `strict_lock<T>` only starting from a valid T object. Notice that there is no other way you can create a `strict_lock<T>`.
 
     BankAccount myAccount("John Doe", "123-45-6789");
-    strict_locerk<BankAccount> myLock(myAccount); // ok
+    strict_lock<BankAccount> myLock(myAccount); // ok
 
 * You cannot copy `strict_lock`s to one another. In particular, you cannot pass `strict_lock`s by value to functions or have them returned by functions:
 
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@
 We need a way to transfer the ownership from the `unique_lock` to a `strict_lock` the time we are working with `savingsAcct_` and then restore the ownership on `unique_lock`.
 
   void AccountManager::AMoreComplicatedChecking2Savings(int amount) {
-      unique_lock<AccountManager> guard(*this, defer_lock);
+      unique_lock<AccountManager> guard1(*this, defer_lock);
       if (some_condition()) {
           guard1.lock();
       }