|
Boost-Commit : |
Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r85606 - trunk/boost/config/compiler
From: john_at_[hidden]
Date: 2013-09-08 12:10:04
Author: johnmaddock
Date: 2013-09-08 12:10:04 EDT (Sun, 08 Sep 2013)
New Revision: 85606
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/85606
Log:
Update for intel-14.0
Text files modified:
trunk/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Modified: trunk/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp
==============================================================================
--- trunk/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp Sun Sep 8 09:57:39 2013 (r85605)
+++ trunk/boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp 2013-09-08 12:10:04 EDT (Sun, 08 Sep 2013) (r85606)
@@ -255,12 +255,29 @@
#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION >= 1310)
# undef BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR
#endif
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION >= 1400)
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNICODE_LITERALS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_RAW_LITERALS
+// This one generates errors when used with conditional exception specifications, for example in multiprecision:
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_NOEXCEPT
+// This breaks multiprecision:
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_EXPLICIT_CONVERSION_OPERATORS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_THREAD
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_CHAR32_T
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_CHAR16_T
+#endif
#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X) && (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 1310)
# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_FUTURE
# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST
#endif
+#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X) && (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION == 1400)
+// A regression in Intel's compiler means that <tuple> seems to be broken in this release as well as <future> :
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_FUTURE
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_TUPLE
+#endif
+
#if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER <= 1700)
//
// Although the Intel compiler is capable of supporting these, it appears not to in MSVC compatibility mode:
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk