Re: [Boost-docs] stl mini-review

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] stl mini-review
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-01 20:04:55


> I would look ahead. The C++0x stuff is fairly stable now, and it
> allows us to express things much more precisely than we could in the
> past.

I'm starting to think the same way. I'll try to spend some time
rewriting the utility concepts next week to align precisely with the
specs.

Andrew Sutton
asutton_at_[hidden]


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:40 UTC