Re: [Boost-docs] FW: [Doxygen-announce] Doxygen version 1.7.3 released

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] FW: [Doxygen-announce] Doxygen version 1.7.3 released
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-08 17:24:12

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-docs-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-docs-
> bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Daniel James
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 2:58 PM
> To: Discussion of Boost Documentation
> Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] FW: [Doxygen-announce] Doxygen version 1.7.3
> released
> 
> On 6 January 2011 18:07, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > This probably means that new users (and old) can use these new
> > versions safely.
> 
> I just tried using 1.7.3 and it has problems with this page:
> 
>
http://boost-sandbox.sourceforge.net/doc/html/boost/interprocess/permissions
.html
> 
> Notice the '@' symbols. The same thing happens when running doxygen with
the
> wizard. The page is fine with 1.7.2 so I'm going to stick with that for
now.

Well I did say "probably"!

But it's curious that it only occurs in a few places - for no obvious-to-me
reason.

(and not on the example docs I have rebuilt so far)

Might it be using different Doxygen comment style?

 - there are so many options that I'm not surprised if the parser is
confused!  I am.

Paul

PS I also note that the font size of 

"segment_manager" is very small

"private static functions" or " public construct/copy/destruct" ... is
rather large.

Other font sizes seem OK.