Re: [Boost-docs] Sphinx integration

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Sphinx integration
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-28 10:55:02

On 28/09/11 11:46, Daniel James wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 10:24, Mateusz Loskot<mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Perhaps quickbook to reStructuredText is a feasible solution.
>> Then all move to writing in reStructuredText, etc.
> You'd probably be better of converting from boostbook or docbook than
> quickbook. You'll also need to convert the rest of the documentation
> and persuade everyone to use docutils.


FYI, I'm not trying to convert anything or anyone.
I'm just trying to understand why documenting Boost is so diverse
and if it coul/why it couldn't be easy and pleasant as the Sphinx,
for example.

> If I was going to pick a uniform markup language, I'd go for HTML.

IMO, HTML is irrelevant.
My question is closer to "Shall I use .doc or .odf?" but not "Shall I
set paragraph in sans or serif".

Best regards,

Mateusz Loskot,
Charter Member of OSGeo,
Member of ACCU,

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC