Re: [Boost-docs] Sphinx integration

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Sphinx integration
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-28 12:24:56

On 28 September 2011 13:04, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 27/09/11 00:46, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Would it be valid to discuss Sphinx for Boost?
> Reconsidering my thoughts on that and I've come to conclusion
> that a strict unification of writing documentation across all the
> libraries in the Boost collection would be impossible and probably
> impractical. It's more a wishful thinking of mine.
> I'm also lacking of better idea(s) myself.
> I have to fight the complexity of documentation workflow
> where I suffer of it myself, it is in Boost.Geometry.

Well, if you can demonstrate how well a solution works, it could see
more uptake. For sphinx, a good start might be to convert the existing
docutils based documentation to sphinx, if possible.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC