Re: [Boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-09 22:33:27

On 1/9/16 1:53 PM, Soul Studios wrote:
>> b) DOxygen is here to stay. I would like to see
>> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
>> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
>> From the users point of view, this would look like
>> the following:
> I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement,

There's not danger of that happening.

> though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to
> writing clean, readable code.

As do I

But I'm accepting as a fact that many like and are going to use it.

I believe we can improve things a lot even while using it. I'm
looking to move forward here.

Robert Ramey

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC