Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-09 22:33:27
On 1/9/16 1:53 PM, Soul Studios wrote:
>> b) DOxygen is here to stay. I would like to see
>> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
>> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
>> From the users point of view, this would look like
>> the following:
> I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement,
There's not danger of that happening.
> though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to
> writing clean, readable code.
As do I
But I'm accepting as a fact that many like and are going to use it.
I believe we can improve things a lot even while using it. I'm
looking to move forward here.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC