Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] C++11 Quickbook
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-10 18:25:23
On 8/4/2017 6:51 PM, Daniel James via Boost-docs wrote:
> I've been doing some quickbook development, and I was thinking of
> using C++11 (maybe auto, rvalue references, variadics, range for loops
> and initializer lists, depending on how widespread support is). Any
> objections? I imagine most people are compiling it with a recent
> compiler anyway.
I think C++11 is fine as the latest versions of gcc, clang, and vc++
default to C++11 mode or higher.
> I'm also thinking about using clang-format. Would anyone object to
> that? Of course I'll have to stop it formatting spirit grammars, so it
> can't be used everywhere.
How would you be using clang-format in quickbook ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC