Subject: Re: Backward compatibility
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-07-04 22:08:25
> > So far we were using the fact that GIL hasn't received updates in years
> > rationale for not caring much about backward compatibility.
I think just the introduction of c++11 features like variadic templates
will "dramatically" reduce the source code and I guess will change the API
in some ways. Same goes for features already in gil like SFINAE which can
be expressed better these days in c++17.
I hope I'm making sense.
Boost list run by Boost-Gil-Owners