Re: Do we need doxygen file header?

Subject: Re: Do we need doxygen file header?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-27 19:08:47

On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 21:04, Stefan Seefeld <stefan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 2018-09-27 02:49 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
> > Do we really need this?
> >
> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > /// \file
> > /// \brief A model of a heterogeneous pixel that is not byte aligned.
> > Examples are bitmap (1-bit pixels) or 6-bit RGB (222)
> > /// \author Lubomir Bourdev and Hailin Jin \n
> > ///         Adobe Systems Incorporated
> > /// \date   2005-2007 \n Last updated on September 28, 2006
> > ///
> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >
> > If we want to keep per-file description for Doxygen [1]
> > perhaps we could simplify it to
> >
> > /// \file
> > /// \brief ...
> >
> > and stick below the licence notice.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> I'd get rid of it all, at least the bits you list above. All that is
> metainfo that can easily obtained from the git log.
> [...]

Perfect! I'll remove it.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net