Re: [Boost-mpi] Develop VS master

Subject: Re: [Boost-mpi] Develop VS master
From: Alain Miniussi (Alain.Miniussi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-15 13:28:55

It passes with:

         - Intel compiler  17.0.2
         - library IMPI 5.0.3.048

On 15/07/2017 14:08, Alain Miniussi via Boost-mpi wrote:
> https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/49
>
>
> On 15/07/2017 14:05, Alain Miniussi via Boost-mpi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just realized that people with a platform boost installed had their 
>> 1.64 distrib building for the wrong reasons... (as long as a 
>> "correct" get_data is included, it can come from /usr...).
>>
>> So, considering:
>>
>> a) Since the 1.65 process is ongoing, huge merges should be avoided.
>> b) The lib needs to live on, develop should be merge quickly so that 
>> we can get some work done.
>> c) The 1.65 should build for good reason.
>> d) current fixes for the get_data issue are in merges against develop.
>>
>> What about the following proposal:
>>
>> I will manually merge the minimal subset of 
>> https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/47 that get master passing the 
>> test even when no boost header are present in /usr/include.
>>
>> It's in branch get_data_fix for those interested. Any issue/build 
>> report is welcomed.
>>
>> Then, short after 1.65 is out, develop will be merged into master 
>> unless someone has issues with it.
>>
>> People can already have a look at 
>> https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/46 and 
>> https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/48.
>>
>> I'll answer to the todo list question in another mail.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Boost-mpi mailing list
>> Boost-mpi_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-mpi mailing list
> Boost-mpi_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi