Boost Testing :
From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-02 22:47:57
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
> Sorry - false alarm - it seems to be working now. I'm not sure what I did.
>>As an aside, I'm puzzled by the following in the serialization.jam
>># we use a single requirement rule to guarantee a speicfic order
>># for evaluation of all the different requirements
>>rule serialization::requirements ( toolset variant : subvariant-path
>>properties * )
>>Its a surprise to me that requirements need to be in some specific
It's usually not a problem.. But when one combines templates and
requirement rules it can get a bit confusing as to what happens when.
It's also more problematic when those rules try to muddle with the same
properties. So instead of taking chances I made sure of the order.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq