Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-06 05:56:57

John Maddock wrote:

>> In the mean while, I'll define BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT.
> Yes, please go ahead with that, thanks,

Hmm, 'is_abstract.hpp' says that the "new" EDG frontend supports this
correctly. Should I perhaps add a definition in "common_edg.hpp" instead of
  "compaq_cxx.hpp"? CXX 6.5-042 reports 245 as __EDG_VERSION__, Intel C++
7.0 has 300, so I'm guessing __EDG_VERSION__ < 300 would be the right check.


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at