Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-29 13:41:53


At Friday 2005-04-29 07:59, you wrote:
>Any one any ideas why this test is failing for the Metacom testers only
>(given the limitation that this test depends on program_options which
>seems to have quite a few regressions at present).
>
>Looking at http://tinyurl.com/a63wt it seems as though the test is being
>invoked without the correct command line argument, which would indicate a
>broken Jamfile, however it works locally for me (Note: if Metacom have
>switched to bjam --v2, then that Jamfile *was* broken: I've just fixed it,
>but the error should have been different if that had been the case).
>
>Thanks,
>
>John.

The latest regression test I see shows all regex passing for vc7_1

>_______________________________________________
>Boost-Testing mailing list
>Boost-Testing_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
>

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com