Re: [Boost-testing] Re: Re: Re: [process_jam_log] Is breaking!

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-02 15:00:38

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Rene Rivera" <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
> news:427678FC.4040700_at_redshift-software.com...
> 
>>Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>
>>>>No.. Perhaps it's this I just saw in the logs:
>>>>
>>>>don't know how to make <@boost!libs!test!example!cla>variable_ex.cpp
>>>
>>>
>>>Ops. Wrong subinclude name. These are fixed.
>>
>>And that seems to have fixed the log processing.. Thanks :-)
> 
> 
> I must say that such fragile postprocessing system doesn't seems reliable.

That it is.. And why getting the test system producing the XML files 
directly will be the highest priority item after 1.33.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org