Re: [Boost-testing] CodeWarrior 9.5 on MacOS X

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-12 10:46:17

On May 12, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Stephen W. Carson wrote:

>    I've upgraded to CW 9.5 on darwin (Mac OS X) and the results can 
> now be seen. Here is a list of test differences I note comparing a run 
> from Tue. with 9.4 to last night's run with 9.5.
>
>    Looking over the libraries that went to failure, (see below), I 
> found the following items came up the most, (looks like a compiler 
> feature went away with 9.5?!?):

Eeep!

>    All these "unimplemented C++ feature" errors are from a few places 
> in random. For example, the following code in linear_congruential.hpp:
> #if !defined(BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS) && 
> !BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(0x551))
>  template<class CharT, class Traits>
>  friend std::basic_ostream<CharT,Traits>&
>  operator<<(std::basic_ostream<CharT,Traits>& os,
>             const linear_congruential& lcg)
>  {
>    return os << lcg._x;
>  }
>
>
>    And the following code from uniform_01.hpp:
> #if !defined(BOOST_NO_OPERATORS_IN_NAMESPACE) && 
> !defined(BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS)
>  template<class CharT, class Traits>
>  friend std::basic_ostream<CharT,Traits>&
>  operator<<(std::basic_ostream<CharT,Traits>& os, const uniform_01& u)
>  {
>    os << u._rng;
>    return os;
>  }

Any idea why it's complaining on these? They look so... benign...

        Doug